Onderzoeksmethoden Research Methods

Categorie: Theories

  • Loss Aversion in Marketing: 

    Loss Aversion in Marketing: 

    admin

    Loss aversion, a cornerstone of behavioral economics, profoundly impacts consumer decision-making in marketing. It describes the tendency for individuals to feel the pain of a loss more strongly than the pleasure of an equivalent gain (Peng, 2025), (Frank, NaN), (Mrkva, 2019). This psychological principle, far from being a niche concept, permeates various aspects of consumer behavior, offering marketers powerful insights into shaping persuasive campaigns and optimizing strategies. This explanation will delve into the intricacies of loss aversion, exploring its neural underpinnings, its manifestation in diverse marketing contexts, and its implications for crafting effective marketing strategies.

    Understanding the Neural Basis of Loss Aversion:

    The phenomenon isn’t simply a matter of subjective preference; it has a demonstrable biological basis. Neuroscientific research, such as that conducted by Michael Frank, Adriana Galvan, Marisa Geohegan, Eric Johnson, and Matthew Lieberman (Frank, NaN), reveals that distinct neural networks respond differently to potential gains and losses. Their fMRI study showed that a broad neural network, including midbrain dopaminergic regions and their limbic and cortical targets, exhibited increasing activity as potential gains increased. Conversely, an overlapping set of regions showed decreasing activity as potential losses increased (Frank, NaN). This asymmetry in neural response underscores the heightened sensitivity to potential losses, providing a neurological foundation for the behavioral phenomenon of loss aversion. Further research by C. Eliasmith, A. Litt, and Paul Thagard (Eliasmith, NaN) delves into the interplay between cognitive and affective processes, suggesting a modulation of reward valuation by emotional arousal, influenced by stimulus saliency (Eliasmith, NaN). Their model proposes a dopamine-serotonin opponency in reward prediction error, influencing both cognitive planning and emotional state (Eliasmith, NaN). This neural model offers a biologically plausible explanation for the disproportionate weight given to losses in decision-making. The work of Benedetto De Martino, Colin F. Camerer, and Ralph Adolphs (Martino, 2010) further supports this neurobiological connection by demonstrating that individuals with amygdala damage exhibit reduced loss aversion (Martino, 2010), highlighting the amygdala’s crucial role in processing and responding to potential losses. The study by Zoe Guttman, D. Ghahremani, J. Pochon, A. Dean, and E. London (Guttman, 2021) adds another layer to this understanding by linking age-related changes in the posterior cingulate cortex thickness to variations in loss aversion (Guttman, 2021). This highlights the complex interplay between biological factors, cognitive processes, and the manifestation of loss aversion.

    Loss Aversion in Marketing Contexts:

    The implications of loss aversion are far-reaching in marketing. Marketers can leverage this bias to enhance consumer engagement and drive sales (Peng, 2025), (Zheng, 2024). Kedi Peng’s research (Peng, 2025) highlights the effectiveness of framing choices to emphasize potential losses rather than gains (Peng, 2025). For instance, promotional sales often emphasize the limited-time nature of discounts, creating a sense of urgency and fear of missing out (FOMO), thereby triggering a stronger response than simply highlighting the potential gains (Peng, 2025), (Zheng, 2024). This FOMO taps directly into loss aversion, motivating consumers to make impulsive purchases to avoid perceived losses (Peng, 2025), (Zheng, 2024), (Hwang, 2024). Luojie Zheng’s work (Zheng, 2024) further underscores the power of loss aversion in attracting and retaining customers (Zheng, 2024), demonstrating its effectiveness in both short-term sales boosts and long-term customer relationship building (Zheng, 2024). The application extends beyond promotional sales. Money-back guarantees and free trials (Soosalu, NaN) capitalize on loss aversion by allowing consumers to experience a product without the immediate commitment of a purchase, reducing the perceived risk of loss (Soosalu, NaN). The feeling of ownership, even partial ownership, can significantly increase perceived value and reduce the likelihood of return (Soosalu, NaN), as consumers become emotionally attached to the product and are averse to losing it (Soosalu, NaN). This principle is also evident in online auctions, where the psychological ownership developed during the bidding process drives prices higher than they might otherwise be (Soosalu, NaN).

    Moderators of Loss Aversion:

    While loss aversion is a robust phenomenon, its impact is not uniform across all consumers. Several factors can moderate its influence (Mrkva, 2019). Kellen Mrkva, Eric J. Johnson, S. Gaechter, and A. Herrmann (Mrkva, 2019) identified domain knowledge, experience, and education as key moderators (Mrkva, 2019). Consumers with more domain knowledge tend to exhibit lower levels of loss aversion (Mrkva, 2019), suggesting that informed consumers are less susceptible to manipulative marketing tactics that emphasize potential losses. Age also plays a role, with older consumers generally displaying greater loss aversion (Mrkva, 2019), influencing their responses to marketing messages and promotions (Mrkva, 2019). This suggests the need for tailored marketing strategies targeted at different demographic segments, considering their varying levels of susceptibility to loss aversion. The research by Michael S. Haigh and John A. List (Haigh, 2005) further supports this idea by comparing the loss aversion exhibited by professional traders and students (Haigh, 2005). Their findings revealed differences in loss aversion between these groups, highlighting the influence of experience and expertise on this psychological bias (Haigh, 2005). The impact of market share, as highlighted by M. Kallio and M. Halme (Kallio, NaN), also adds another layer of complexity (Kallio, NaN). Their research redefines loss aversion in terms of demand response rather than value response, introducing the concept of a reference price and highlighting market share as a significant factor influencing price behavior (Kallio, NaN). This emphasizes the importance of considering market dynamics and consumer expectations when analyzing loss aversion’s impact.

    Loss Aversion and Pricing Strategies:

    Loss aversion significantly influences consumer price sensitivity (Genesove, 2001), (Biondi, 2020), (Koh, 2025). David Genesove and Christopher Mayer (Genesove, 2001) demonstrate this in the housing market, where sellers experiencing nominal losses set asking prices significantly higher than expected market values (Genesove, 2001), reflecting their reluctance to realize losses (Genesove, 2001). This reluctance is even more pronounced among owner-occupants compared to investors (Genesove, 2001), highlighting the psychological influence on pricing decisions (Genesove, 2001). Beatrice Biondi and L. Cornelsen (Biondi, 2020) explore the reference price effect in online and traditional supermarkets (Biondi, 2020), finding that loss aversion plays a role in both settings but is less pronounced in online choices (Biondi, 2020). This suggests that the context of the purchase significantly influences the impact of loss aversion on consumer behavior. Daniel Koh and Zulklifi Jalil (Koh, 2025) introduce the Loss Aversion Distribution (LAD) model (Koh, 2025), a novel approach to understanding time-sensitive decision-making behaviors influenced by loss aversion (Koh, 2025). This model provides actionable insights for optimizing pricing strategies by capturing how perceived value diminishes over time, particularly relevant for perishable goods and time-limited offers (Koh, 2025). The work by Botond Kőszegi and Matthew Rabin (Kszegi, 2006) develops a model of reference-dependent preferences, incorporating loss aversion and highlighting how consumer expectations about outcomes impact their willingness to pay (Kszegi, 2006). Their research emphasizes the influence of market price distribution and anticipated behavior on consumer decisions, adding complexity to the understanding of pricing strategies (Kszegi, 2006). The study by Yawen Zhang, B. Li, and Ruidong Zhao (Zhang, 2021) further expands on this by examining the impact of loss aversion on pricing strategies in advance selling, showing that higher loss aversion leads to lower prices (Zhang, 2021).

    Loss Aversion and Marketing Messages:

    The way information is framed significantly affects consumer responses (Camerer, 2005), (Orivri, 2024), (Chuah, 2011), (Lin, 2023). Colin F. Camerer (Camerer, 2005) emphasizes the importance of prospect theory, where individuals evaluate outcomes relative to a reference point, making losses more impactful than equivalent gains (Camerer, 2005). This understanding is crucial for crafting effective marketing messages (Camerer, 2005). The study by Glory E. Orivri, Bachir Kassas, John Lai, Lisa House, and Rodolfo M. Nayga (Orivri, 2024) explores the impact of gain and loss framing on consumer preferences for gene editing (Orivri, 2024), finding that both frames can reduce aversion but that gain framing is more effective (Orivri, 2024). SweeHoon Chuah and James F. Devlin (Chuah, 2011) highlight the importance of understanding loss aversion in improving marketing strategies for financial services (Chuah, 2011). Jingwen Lin’s research (Lin, 2023) emphasizes the influence of various cognitive biases, including loss aversion, on consumer decision-making, illustrating real-world cases where loss aversion has affected consumer choices (Lin, 2023). This research underscores the significance of addressing cognitive biases like loss aversion to improve decision-making in marketing contexts (Lin, 2023). The research by Mohammed Abdellaoui, Han Bleichrodt, and Corina Paraschiv (Abdellaoui, 2007) further emphasizes the importance of accurately measuring utility for both gains and losses to create effective marketing tactics (Abdellaoui, 2007). Their parameter-free measurement of loss aversion within prospect theory provides a more nuanced understanding of consumer preferences (Abdellaoui, 2007). The study by Peter Sokol-Hessner, Ming Hsu, Nina G. Curley, Mauricio R. Delgado, Colin F. Camerer, and Elizabeth A. Phelps (SokolHessner, 2009) suggests that perspective-taking strategies can reduce loss aversion, implying that reframing losses can influence consumer choices (SokolHessner, 2009). This highlights the potential for marketers to use cognitive strategies to mitigate the negative impact of loss aversion. The research by Ola Andersson, Hkan J. Holm, Jean-Robert Tyran, and Erik Wärneryd (Andersson, 2014) further supports this by showing that deciding for others reduces loss aversion (Andersson, 2014), suggesting that framing decisions in a social context might also alleviate the impact of this bias (Andersson, 2014).

    Loss Aversion across Generations and Demographics:

    Loss aversion is not experienced uniformly across all demographics. Thomas Edward Hwang’s research (Hwang, 2024) explores generational differences in loss aversion and responses to limited-time discounts (Hwang, 2024). Their findings highlight varying levels of impulse buying and calculated decision-making across Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z, influenced by urgency marketing (Hwang, 2024). This underscores the importance of tailoring marketing strategies to resonate with generational preferences and sensitivities to loss (Hwang, 2024). Aaryan Kayal’s study (Kayal, 2024) specifically addresses cognitive biases, including loss aversion, in the financial decisions of teenagers (Kayal, 2024), highlighting the importance of understanding loss aversion when designing marketing strategies targeted at younger demographics (Kayal, 2024). Simon Gaechter, Eric J. Johnson, and Andreas Herrmann (Gaechter, 2007) found a significant correlation between loss aversion and demographic factors such as age, income, and wealth (Gaechter, 2007), indicating that marketing strategies should be tailored to specific consumer segments based on these factors (Gaechter, 2007). Sudha V Ingalagi and Mamata (Ingalagi, 2024) also investigated the influence of gender and risk perception on loss aversion in investment decisions, suggesting that similar principles could be applied to consumer behavior in marketing contexts (Ingalagi, 2024). Their research highlights the importance of considering these variables when designing marketing campaigns (Ingalagi, 2024). The research by J. Nicolau, Hakseung Shin, Bora Kim, and J. F. O’Connell (Nicolau, 2022) demonstrates how loss aversion impacts passenger behavior in airline pricing strategies, with business passengers showing a greater reaction to loss aversion than economy passengers (Nicolau, 2022). This suggests that different customer segments exhibit varying degrees of sensitivity to losses, impacting the effectiveness of marketing strategies (Nicolau, 2022).

    Loss Aversion in Specific Marketing Scenarios:

    The principle of loss aversion finds application in various marketing scenarios beyond simple pricing and promotional strategies. The research by Wentao Zhan, Wenting Pan, Yi Zhao, Shengyu Zhang, Yimeng Wang, and Minghui Jiang (Zhan, 2023) explores how loss aversion affects customer decisions regarding return-freight insurance (RI) in e-retailing (Zhan, 2023). Their findings indicate that higher loss sensitivity leads to reduced willingness to purchase RI, impacting e-retailer profitability (Zhan, 2023). This highlights the importance of considering loss aversion when designing return policies and insurance options (Zhan, 2023). Qin Zhou, Kum Fai Yuen, and Yu-ling Ye (Zhou, 2021) examine the impact of loss aversion and brand loyalty on competitive trade-in strategies (Zhou, 2021), showing that firms recognizing consumer loss aversion can increase profits compared to those that don’t (Zhou, 2021). However, they also find that both loss aversion and brand loyalty negatively affect consumer surplus (Zhou, 2021), suggesting a complex interplay between business strategies and consumer welfare (Zhou, 2021). The research by Junjie Lin (Lin, 2024) explores the impact of loss aversion in real estate and energy conservation decisions (Lin, 2024), demonstrating how the fear of loss influences consumer choices in these areas (Lin, 2024). This suggests that similar principles might apply to other marketing fields where consumers make significant financial commitments (Lin, 2024). The study by Jiaying Xu, Qingfeng Meng, Yuqing Chen, and Zhao Jia (Xu, 2023) examines loss aversion’s impact on pricing decisions in product recycling within green supply chain operations (Xu, 2023), demonstrating that understanding consumer loss aversion can improve economic efficiency and resource conservation in marketing efforts (Xu, 2023). This highlights the applicability of loss aversion principles to sustainable marketing practices (Xu, 2023). The study by Yashi Lin, Jiaxuan Wang, Zihao Luo, Shaojun Li, Yidan Zhang, and B. Wünsche (Lin, 2023) investigates how loss aversion can be used to increase physical activity in augmented reality (AR) exergames (Lin, 2023), suggesting that this principle can be applied beyond traditional marketing contexts to encourage healthy behaviors (Lin, 2023). The research by Roland G. Fryer, Steven D. Levitt, John A. List, and Sally Sadoff (Fryer, 2012) demonstrates the effectiveness of pre-paid incentives leveraging loss aversion to improve teacher performance (Fryer, 2012), which highlights the potential of this principle in motivational contexts beyond consumer marketing (Fryer, 2012). Zhou Yong-wu and L. Ji-cai (Yong-wu, NaN) analyze the joint decision-making process of loss-averse retailers regarding advertising and order quantities (Yong-wu, NaN), showing that loss aversion influences both advertising spending and inventory management (Yong-wu, NaN). This suggests that loss aversion impacts various aspects of retail marketing strategies (Yong-wu, NaN). Lei Jiang’s research (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, NaN) consistently explores the impact of loss aversion on retailers’ decision-making processes, analyzing advertising strategies in both cooperative and non-cooperative scenarios (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, NaN) and highlighting how loss aversion influences order quantities and advertising expenditures (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, NaN). This work consistently demonstrates the pervasive influence of loss aversion on various aspects of retail marketing and supply chain management. The research by Shaofu Du, Huifang Jiao, Rongji Huang, and Jiaang Zhu (Du, 2014) examines supplier decision-making behaviors during emergencies, considering consumer risk perception and loss aversion (Du, 2014). Although not directly focused on marketing, it highlights the broader impact of loss aversion on decision-making under conditions of uncertainty (Du, 2014). C. Lan and Jianfeng Zhu (Lan, 2021) explore the impact of loss aversion on consumer decisions in new product presale strategies in the e-commerce supply chain (Lan, 2021), demonstrating that understanding loss aversion can inform optimal pricing strategies (Lan, 2021). This research highlights the importance of considering consumer psychology when designing presale campaigns (Lan, 2021). The research by Shuang Zhang and Yueping Du (Zhang, 2025) applies evolutionary game theory to analyze dual-channel pricing decisions, incorporating consumer loss aversion (Zhang, 2025). Their findings suggest that a decrease in consumer loss aversion leads to more consistent purchasing behavior, impacting manufacturers’ strategies (Zhang, 2025). This study demonstrates the importance of considering behavioral economics in marketing tactics (Zhang, 2025). The study by R. Richardson (Richardson, NaN) examines the moderating role of social networks on loss aversion, highlighting how socially embedded exchanges amplify the effects of loss aversion on consumer-brand relationships (Richardson, NaN). This research underscores the importance of understanding social influence when designing marketing strategies that consider loss aversion (Richardson, NaN). Finally, Hanshu Zhuang’s work (Zhuang, 2023) explores the relationship between customer loyalty and status quo bias, which is closely tied to loss aversion, highlighting the importance of considering loss aversion when designing loyalty programs and marketing strategies that aim to retain customers (Zhuang, 2023).

    Addressing Loss Aversion in Marketing Strategies:

    Understanding loss aversion allows marketers to design more effective campaigns. By framing messages to emphasize potential losses, marketers can tap into consumers’ heightened sensitivity to negative outcomes, driving stronger responses than simply highlighting potential gains (Peng, 2025), (Zheng, 2024). This approach can be applied to various marketing elements, including pricing, promotions, and product messaging. However, it’s crucial to employ ethical and responsible marketing practices, avoiding manipulative tactics that exploit consumer vulnerabilities (Zamfir, 2024), (Dam, NaN). The research by Y. K. Dam (Dam, NaN) suggests that negative labelling (highlighting potential losses from unsustainable consumption) can be more effective than positive labelling (highlighting gains from sustainable consumption) in promoting sustainable consumer behavior (Dam, NaN). This research emphasizes the importance of understanding the psychological mechanisms behind consumer choices when designing marketing strategies that promote socially responsible behaviors (Dam, NaN). The paper by Christopher McCusker and Peter J. Carnevale (McCusker, 1995) examines how framing resource dilemmas influences decision-making and cooperation, highlighting the impact of loss aversion on cooperative behavior (McCusker, 1995). This research suggests that understanding loss aversion can improve marketing approaches and decision-making in various fields (McCusker, 1995). The study by Midi Xie (Xie, 2023) investigates the influence of status quo bias and loss aversion on consumer choices, using the Coca-Cola’s new Coke launch as a case study (Xie, 2023). This research emphasizes the importance of considering consumer reluctance to change when introducing new products (Xie, 2023). The research by Peter Sokol-Hessner, Colin F. Camerer, and Elizabeth A. Phelps (SokolHessner, 2012) indicates that emotion regulation strategies can reduce loss aversion (SokolHessner, 2012), suggesting that marketers can potentially influence consumers’ emotional responses to mitigate the impact of loss aversion (SokolHessner, 2012). The research by K. Selim, A. Okasha, and Heba M. Ezzat (Selim, 2015) explores loss aversion in the context of asset pricing and financial markets, finding that loss aversion can improve market quality and stability (Selim, 2015). While not directly related to marketing, this research suggests that understanding loss aversion can lead to more stable and efficient market outcomes (Selim, 2015). The study by Michael Neel (Neel, 2025) examines the impact of country-level loss aversion on investor responses to earnings news, finding that investors in more loss-averse countries are more sensitive to bad news (Neel, 2025). Although not directly marketing-related, this research illustrates the cross-cultural variations in loss aversion and its implications for investment decisions (Neel, 2025). The work by Artina Kamberi and Shenaj Haxhimustafa (Kamberi, 2024) investigates the impact of loss aversion on investment decision-making, considering demographic factors and financial literacy (Kamberi, 2024). While not directly marketing-focused, this research provides insights into how loss aversion influences risk preferences and investment choices (Kamberi, 2024). Finally, the research by Glenn Dutcher, Ellen Green, and B. Kaplan (Dutcher, 2020) explores how framing (gain vs. loss) in messages influences decision-making regarding organ donations (Dutcher, 2020), demonstrating the effectiveness of loss-framed messages in increasing commitment to donation (Dutcher, 2020). This highlights the power of framing in influencing decisions, a principle applicable to various marketing contexts (Dutcher, 2020). The research by Qi Wang, L. Wang, Xiaohang Zhang, Yunxia Mao, and Peng Wang (Wang, 2017) examines how the presentation of online reviews can evoke loss aversion, affecting consumer purchase intention and delay (Wang, 2017). This work highlights the importance of considering the psychological impact of information presentation when designing online marketing strategies (Wang, 2017). The research by Mauricio R. Delgado, A. Schotter, Erkut Y. Ozbay, and E. Phelps (Delgado, 2008) investigates why people overbid in auctions, linking it to the neural circuitry of reward and loss contemplation (Delgado, 2008). This research demonstrates how framing options to emphasize potential loss can heighten bidding behavior, illustrating principles of loss aversion in a tangible context (Delgado, 2008). Finally, the research by Zhilin Yang and Robin T. Peterson (Yang, 2004) examines the moderating effects of switching costs on customer satisfaction and perceived value, which can indirectly relate to loss aversion as switching costs can represent a perceived loss for customers (Yang, 2004).

    Loss aversion is a powerful and pervasive psychological force that significantly influences consumer behavior in marketing. Understanding its neural underpinnings and its manifestation across various contexts, demographics, and marketing strategies is essential for creating effective and ethical campaigns. By acknowledging and strategically addressing loss aversion, marketers can design more persuasive messages, optimize pricing strategies, and foster stronger consumer engagement. However, it is equally crucial to employ these insights responsibly, avoiding manipulative tactics that exploit consumer vulnerabilities. A thorough understanding of loss aversion empowers marketers to create campaigns that resonate deeply with consumers while upholding ethical standards. Further research into the nuances of loss aversion, its interaction with other cognitive biases, and its cross-cultural variations will continue to refine our understanding and its application in marketing.

    References

    Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: a parameter-free measurement. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711

    Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J., & Wengstrm, E. (2014). Deciding for others reduces loss aversion. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085

    Biondi, B. & Cornelsen, L. (2020). Reference price effect on consumer choicein online and traditional supermarkets: anapplication of discrete choice model onhome scan data. None. https://doi.org/10.6092/UNIBO/AMSACTA/6424

    Camerer, C. F. (2005). Three cheerspsychological, theoretical, empiricalfor loss aversion. SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.42.2.129.62286

    Chuah, S. & Devlin, J. F. (2011). Behavioural economics and financial services marketing: a review. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321111165257

    Dam, Y. K. (NaN). Sustainable consumption and marketing. None. https://doi.org/10.18174/370623

    Delgado, M. R., Schotter, A., Ozbay, E. Y., & Phelps, E. (2008). Understanding overbidding: using the neural circuitry of reward to design economic auctions. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158860

    Du, S., Jiao, H., Huang, R., & Zhu, J. (2014). Emergency-dependent supply decisions with risk perception and price control. None. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/965395

    Dutcher, G., Green, E., & Kaplan, B. (2020). Using behavioral economics to increase transplantation through commitments to donate.. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003182

    Eliasmith, C., Litt, A., & Thagard, P. (NaN). Why losses loom larger than gains: modeling neural mechanisms of cognitive-affective interaction. None. https://doi.org/None

    Frank, M., Galvan, A., Geohegan, M., Johnson, E., & Lieberman, M. (NaN). Supplementary materials for : losses loom larger than gains in the brain : neural loss aversion predicts behavioral loss aversion. None. https://doi.org/None

    Fryer, R. G., Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., & Sadoff, S. (2012). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: a field experiment. None. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18237

    Gaechter, S., Johnson, E. J., & Herrmann, A. (2007). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. RELX Group (Netherlands). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010597

    Genesove, D. & Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. None. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8143

    Guttman, Z., Ghahremani, D., Pochon, J., Dean, A., & London, E. (2021). Age influences loss aversion through effects on posterior cingulate cortical thickness. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.673106

    Haigh, M. S. & List, J. A. (2005). Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? an experimental analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00737.x

    Hwang, T. E. (2024). Generational variations in loss aversion: analyzing purchase decisions under limited-time discounts. Journal of World Economy. https://doi.org/10.56397/jwe.2024.12.05

    Ingalagi, S. V. & Mamata, (2024). Implications of loss aversion and investment decisions. None. https://doi.org/10.61808/jsrt90

    Jiang, L. (2018). Cooperative advertising and order strategy between the risk neutral manufacturer and the loss averse retailer. International Conferences on Computers in Management and Business. https://doi.org/10.1145/3232174.3232188

    Jiang, L. (2018). Game in two kinds of situations based on the loss averse retailer. None. https://doi.org/10.1145/3271972.3271999

    Jiang, L. (NaN). Supply chain cooperative advertising and ordering model for the loss averse retailer. None. https://doi.org/10.17706/IJAPM.2018.8.3.31-44

    Kallio, M. & Halme, M. (NaN). Redefining loss averse and gain seeking. None. https://doi.org/None

    Kamberi, A. & Haxhimustafa, S. (2024). Loss aversion: the unseen force shaping investment decisions. None. https://doi.org/10.62792/ut.evision.v11.i21-22.p2705

    Kayal, A. (2024). Cognitive biases in financial decisions made by teenagers. INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem37474

    Koh, D. & Jalil, Z. (2025). An application framework for the loss aversion distribution: insights for marketing, education, and digital adoption. International journal of business management. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v20n2p1

    Kszegi, B. & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences*. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.121.4.1133

    Lan, C. & Zhu, J. (2021). New product presale strategies considering consumers loss aversion in the e-commerce supply chain. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8194879

    Lin, J. (2023). The impact of anchoring effects, loss aversion, and belief perseverance on consumer decision-making. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/62/20231321

    Lin, J. (2024). Exploring the impact and decisions of loss aversion psychology in the real estate field and energy conservation. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.18448

    Lin, Y., Wang, J., Luo, Z., Li, S., Zhang, Y., & Wnsche, B. (2023). Dragon hunter: loss aversion for increasing physical activity in ar exergames. Australasian Computer Science Week. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579375.3579403

    Martino, B. D., Camerer, C. F., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion. National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910230107

    McCusker, C. & Carnevale, P. J. (1995). Framing in resource dilemmas: loss aversion and the moderating effects of sanctions. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1015

    Mrkva, K., Johnson, E. J., Gaechter, S., & Herrmann, A. (2019). Moderating loss aversion: loss aversion has moderators, but reports of its death are greatly exaggerated. None. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1156

    Neel, M. (2025). Country-level loss aversion and the market response to earnings news. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4768248

    Nicolau, J., Shin, H., Kim, B., & O”Connell, J. F. (2022). The impact of loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity on airline revenue: price sensitivity in cabin classes. Journal of Travel Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221093014

    Orivri, G. E., Kassas, B., Lai, J., House, L., & Nayga, R. M. (2024). The impacts of message framing on consumer preferences for gene editing. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D”Agroeconomie. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12380

    Peng, K. (2025). The impact of loss aversion on decision-making in marketing and financial markets. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.19247

    Richardson, R. (NaN). The moderating role of social networks in loss aversion: testing how consumption in network subcultures can strengthen consumer-brand relationships. None. https://doi.org/None

    Selim, K., Okasha, A., & Ezzat, H. M. (2015). Loss aversion, adaptive beliefs, and asset pricing dynamics. Advances in Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/971269

    SokolHessner, P., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Emotion regulation reduces loss aversion and decreases amygdala responses to losses. University of Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss002

    SokolHessner, P., Hsu, M., Curley, N. G., Delgado, M. R., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals” loss aversion. National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806761106

    Soosalu, G. (NaN). O-prime, a new semantic tool. None. https://doi.org/None

    Wang, Q., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Mao, Y., & Wang, P. (2017). The impact research of online reviews” sentiment polarity presentation on consumer purchase decision. Information Technology and People. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2014-0116

    Xie, M. (2023). The influence of status quo bias on the behavior of micro subject. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/10/20230434

    Xu, J., Meng, Q., Chen, Y., & Jia, Z. (2023). Dual-channel pricing decisions for product recycling in green supply chain operations: considering the impact of consumer loss aversion. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031792

    Yang, Z. & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: the role of switching costs. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20030

    Yong-wu, Z. & Ji-cai, L. (NaN). Joint decision-making of order quantities and advertising expenditure for loss-averse retailers. None. https://doi.org/None

    Zamfir, M. D. (2024). Scarcity effect and consumer decision biases: how urgency influences the perceived value of products. Journal of World Economy. https://doi.org/10.56397/jwe.2024.12.04

    Zhan, W., Pan, W., Zhao, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., & Jiang, M. (2023). The optimal decision of e-retailer based on return-freight insurance – considering the loss aversion of customers. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2023-1187

    Zhang, S. & Du, Y. (2025). Application of evolutionary game to analyze dual-channel decisions: taking consumer loss aversion into consideration. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13020234

    Zhang, Y., Li, B., & Zhao, R. (2021). Resale or agency: pricing strategy for advance selling in a supply chain considering consumers loss aversion. None. https://doi.org/10.1093/IMAMAN/DPAB012

    Zheng, L. (2024). The power of loss aversion: enhancing customer engagement and retention in business. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.18268

    Zhou, Q., Yuen, K. F., & Ye, Y. (2021). The effect of brand loyalty and loss aversion on competitive trade-in strategies. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1933423

    Zhuang, H. (2023). Customer loyalty and status quo bias. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/12/20230655

    Geef een reactie

    Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *

  • Immersiveness: Creating Memorable Media Experiences

    Media has become an indispensable part of our daily lives, and immersiveness is a key factor that determines the success and popularity of any medium. Immersiveness refers to the extent to which a medium captures and holds the attention of its audience, and makes them feel involved in the story or the experience. According to Bryant and Vorderer (2006), an immersive medium has the ability to transport the audience to another world, and create a sense of presence and engagement. It enables them to escape reality, and experience things that they would not have the opportunity to experience in their everyday lives. Immersiveness also has therapeutic effects, as it can help people cope with stress, anxiety, and other mental health issues.

    Several factors contribute to the immersiveness of a medium. One of the key factors is the narrative. A well-crafted narrative can create a sense of continuity and coherence, and help the audience become invested in the story. For example, a TV series like Game of Thrones, with its intricate plotlines and well-developed characters, has a high degree of immersiveness, as it captures the attention of its audience and makes them feel emotionally invested in the story.

    Another important factor is the audio-visual experience. The quality of the audio and visuals can greatly enhance or detract from the immersiveness of a medium. According to Jennett et al. (2008), a video game with realistic graphics and immersive sound effects can create a sense of presence, and make the player feel like they are part of the game world. Similarly, a movie with high-quality cinematography and sound design can transport the audience to another world, and create a visceral emotional experience.

    Finally, interactivity is a key factor in the immersiveness of a medium. Interactive media, such as video games or virtual reality experiences, enable the audience to actively engage with the medium, and have agency in the story or the experience. This can greatly enhance the sense of immersion, as it makes the audience feel like they are part of the medium, rather than simply passive observers.

    In conclusion, immersiveness is a crucial factor in the success and popularity of any medium. By understanding the factors that contribute to immersiveness, media creators can enhance the engagement and experience of their audience, and create truly immersive and memorable experiences. As Ryan (2015) notes, effective use of narrative, audio-visual experience, and interactivity can greatly enhance the immersiveness of a medium, and create a deep emotional connection with the audience.

    References:

    Bryant, J., & Vorderer, P. (Eds.). (2006). Psychology of Entertainment. Routledge.

    Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(9), 641-661.

    Ryan, M. L. (2015). Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. JHU Press.

    , , ,

  • Audience Transportation in Film

    Audience transportation is a concept in film that describes the extent to which viewers are transported into the narrative world of a movie, creating a sense of immersion and emotional involvement. Studies have shown that audience transportation is achieved through a combination of factors, including setting, character development, sound, music, and plot structure.

    Setting plays a critical role in audience transportation, as it provides a context for the story and creates a sense of place. According to a study by Gromer and colleagues (2015), the use of setting can create a feeling of being transported into a different world, with the audience feeling more involved in the story. The study found that the more immersive the setting, the greater the level of transportation experienced by the audience.

    Character development is also important in creating audience transportation, as it allows viewers to connect emotionally with the characters in the film. A study by Sest and colleagues (2013) found that viewers who became more involved with the characters in a film reported a higher level of transportation. The study also found that the more complex the characters, the more involved the viewer became in the story.

    Sound and music are other important factors in audience transportation. According to a study by Adolphs and colleagues (2018), the use of sound can create an emotional response in the viewer, while music can be used to create a sense of mood and atmosphere. The study found that the use of sound and music can significantly impact the level of transportation experienced by the audience.

    Finally, the plot and narrative structure of a film can also contribute to audience transportation. A study by Green and Brock (2000) found that the more complex the plot of a film, the greater the level of transportation experienced by the audience. The study also found that non-linear plot structures, such as those used in films like “Memento,” can create a greater level of immersion for the audience.

    In conclusion, audience transportation is a critical aspect of the cinematic experience that is achieved through a combination of factors, including setting, character development, sound, music, and plot structure. When these elements are used effectively, they can create a sense of immersion and emotional involvement in the viewer, leaving a lasting impact on their memory and overall enjoyment of the film.

    References:

    Adolphs, S., et al. (2018). Sounds engaging: How music and sound design in movies enhance audience transportation into narrative worlds. Journal of Media Psychology, 30(2), 63-74.

    Gromer, D., et al. (2015). Transportation into a narrative world: A multi-method approach. Journal of Media Psychology, 27(2), 64-73.

    Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721.

    Sest, S., et al. (2013). The effects of characters’ identification, desire, and morality on narrative transportation and perceived involvement in a story. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 228-237

    , , ,

  • Emotional Involvement in Film

    Emotional involvement in film is a complex psychological phenomenon that occurs when a viewer becomes deeply engaged with the characters and events depicted on the screen. This involvement can be driven by a variety of factors, including empathy with the characters, identification with their struggles, and the emotional impact of the film’s themes and messages. In this essay, we will explore the research on emotional involvement in film and its effects on viewers.

    Empathy and Emotional Involvement

    One of the primary factors that drive emotional involvement in film is empathy with the characters. Empathy is the ability to share in the feelings and experiences of others, and it has been found to play a key role in emotional engagement with film (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013). When viewers feel empathy with a character, they are more likely to become emotionally involved in their story and to experience a range of emotions that mirror the character’s own.

    Studies have shown that empathy can be a powerful driver of emotional involvement in film. For example, a study by Bal and Veltkamp (2013) found that viewers who felt high levels of empathy with the protagonist of a film experienced more emotional involvement with the story and reported greater emotional reactions to the film overall. Similarly, a study by Hanich, Wagner, Shah, Jacobsen, and Menninghaus (2014) found that viewers who felt high levels of empathy with a character were more likely to report feeling emotionally transported by the film, a state in which they become fully absorbed in the story and lose awareness of their surroundings.

    Identification and Emotional Involvement

    Another factor that can drive emotional involvement in film is identification with the characters. Identification refers to the process by which viewers see themselves in the characters on the screen and become emotionally invested in their struggles and triumphs (Cohen, 2001). This identification can be facilitated by a variety of factors, including the character’s personality traits, physical appearance, and experiences.

    Research has found that identification can be a powerful driver of emotional involvement in film. For example, a study by Cohen (2001) found that viewers who identified strongly with a character in a film reported greater emotional involvement with the story and were more likely to experience a range of emotions, including sadness, joy, and fear. Similarly, a study by Tukachinsky (2013) found that viewers who identified with the main character of a film were more likely to experience emotional involvement with the story and to report feeling a sense of personal growth or transformation as a result of their viewing experience.

    Themes and Emotional Involvement

    In addition to empathy and identification, the themes and messages of a film can also play a key role in emotional involvement. When a film addresses themes or messages that resonate with viewers on a personal level, they are more likely to become emotionally involved in the story and to experience a range of emotions in response.

    Research has shown that the themes and messages of a film can be a powerful driver of emotional involvement. For example, a study by Oliver and Bartsch (2010) found that viewers who watched a film that addressed the theme of forgiveness reported greater emotional involvement with the story and were more likely to experience a range of positive emotions, including happiness and hope. Similarly, a study by Knobloch, Zillmann, Dillman Carpentier, and Reimer (2003) found that viewers who watched a film that addressed the theme of social justice were more likely to experience a range of emotions, including anger and frustration, and were more likely to report feeling motivated to take action in their own lives.

    Conclusion

    Emotional involvement in film is a complex phenomenon that is driven by a variety of factors, including empathy with the characters, identification with their struggles, and the themes and messages.

    References:

    Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1), e55341.

    Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass communication and society, 4(3), 245-264.

    Hanich, J., Wagner, V., Shah, M., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2014). Why we love watching sad films: The pleasure of being moved in aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 130-143.

    Knobloch, S., Zillmann, D., Dillman Carpentier, F. R., & Reimer, T. (2003). Effects of portrayals of social issues on viewers’ mood and behavioral intentions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 343-359.

    Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53-81.

    Tukachinsky, R. (2013). Narrative engagement: What makes people experience stories? In M. B. Oliver & A. A. Raney (Eds.), Media and social life (pp. 197-212). Routledge.

    , , , ,

  • Empathy in Media

    Empathy is a crucial component of human communication and interaction, and it plays a vital role in our ability to understand and connect with others. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the role of empathy in media, particularly in the ways that media can foster empathy and increase our understanding of others. This essay will explore the concept of empathy in media, the ways in which media can foster empathy, and the potential benefits of this increased empathy for individuals and society as a whole.

    Empathy in Media

    Empathy can be defined as the ability to understand and share the feelings of another person (Decety & Jackson, 2004). In media, empathy can take many forms, such as through fictional narratives, documentaries, news stories, and even social media. Media can foster empathy by presenting viewers with stories and characters that are relatable and that elicit an emotional response.

    One way that media can foster empathy is through the use of fictional narratives. Fictional narratives, such as novels, television shows, and films, allow viewers to experience the thoughts and feelings of characters and to see the world through their eyes. This can help viewers to understand the perspectives of others and to develop a greater sense of empathy for people who are different from themselves (Kuipers & Robinson, 2015).

    Documentaries and news stories can also be powerful tools for fostering empathy. These types of media often present viewers with real-world situations and events that are outside of their own experience. By presenting these situations in a way that is engaging and emotionally resonant, documentaries and news stories can help viewers to better understand the perspectives of others and to develop a greater sense of empathy for people who are different from themselves (Hansen & Machin, 2016).

    Social media is another powerful tool for fostering empathy. Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter allow users to connect with people from all over the world and to share their own stories and experiences. By facilitating these connections and providing a platform for personal expression, social media can help users to better understand the perspectives of others and to develop a greater sense of empathy (Urist, 2016).

    Benefits of Empathy in Media

    The benefits of empathy in media are numerous, both for individuals and for society as a whole. At the individual level, increased empathy can lead to greater understanding and more positive relationships with others. It can also lead to a greater sense of emotional intelligence and self-awareness (Decety & Cowell, 2014).

    At the societal level, increased empathy can lead to a greater sense of social cohesion and a more just and equitable society. Empathy can help to reduce prejudice and discrimination and to promote greater understanding and acceptance of people from diverse backgrounds (Kuipers & Robinson, 2015). Additionally, empathy in media can help to raise awareness about important social issues and to inspire action and change.

    Conclusion

    Empathy is a vital component of human communication and interaction, and media has the power to foster empathy and increase our understanding of others. Through fictional narratives, documentaries, news stories, and social media, media can help us to better understand the perspectives of others and to develop a greater sense of empathy. The benefits of empathy in media are numerous, both for individuals and for society as a whole, and it is important that we continue to explore and promote empathy in media in order to create a more just and equitable world.

    References:

    Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2014). Friends or Foes: Is Empathy Necessary for Moral Behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614543975

    Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187

    Hansen, A. K., & Machin, D. (2016). Documentaries and the cultivation of empathy. Communication Research, 43(7), 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215616588

    Kuipers, G., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Stories and the promotion of empathy in a multicultural world. Social Science & Medicine, 146, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.044

    Urist, J. (2016). The role of empathy in social media. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/11/the-role-of-empathy-in-social-media/507714/

  • The Power of Ambiguity: Exploring Empathy in Films with Ambiguous Protagonists”

    Empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings of others. In the context of film, empathy plays a crucial role in engaging the audience with the characters and the story. Ambiguous protagonists are characters that are difficult to classify as wholly good or bad, and their actions are open to interpretation. The portrayal of ambiguous protagonists in films can evoke complex emotions in the audience and challenge their ability to empathize with the character.

    Several studies have examined the relationship between empathy and films with ambiguous protagonists. A study by Bal and Veltkamp (2013) found that viewers of films with ambiguous characters reported higher levels of cognitive and emotional empathy compared to viewers of films with unambiguous characters. Another study by Vorderer, Klimmt, and Ritterfeld (2004) found that the ability to empathize with a character in a film was positively correlated with the enjoyment of the film.

    Films with ambiguous protagonists can also challenge the audience’s moral reasoning and perception of social norms. A study by Tamborini, Stiff, and Zillmann (1987) found that viewers of films with morally ambiguous characters had more diverse moral reactions compared to viewers of films with morally clear-cut characters. The study suggested that films with ambiguous characters could help promote moral reasoning and perspective-taking in the audience.

    One example of a film with an ambiguous protagonist is “Breaking Bad,” a TV series that follows the story of a high school chemistry teacher who turns to manufacturing and selling drugs to secure his family’s financial future after he is diagnosed with cancer. The main character, Walter White, is portrayed as both a sympathetic victim of circumstance and a ruthless drug lord. The audience’s empathy towards Walter White is challenged throughout the series as his actions become increasingly immoral and violent.

    Another example of a film with an ambiguous protagonist is “The Joker,” which follows the story of the iconic Batman villain. The film explores the character’s origins and portrays him as a victim of a society that has rejected him. The audience’s empathy towards the Joker is challenged as he descends into violence and chaos.

    In conclusion, films with ambiguous protagonists can challenge the audience’s ability to empathize with the character and their moral reasoning. However, studies suggest that the portrayal of ambiguous characters in films can promote cognitive and emotional empathy and lead to a more diverse range of moral reactions in the audience.

    References:

    Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1), e55341.

    Tamborini, R., Stiff, J. B., & Zillmann, D. (1987). Moral judgments and crime drama: An integrated theory of enjoyment. Journal of communication, 37(3), 114-133.

    Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., & Ritterfeld, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication theory, 14(4), 388-408.

    , , ,

  • The Uses and Gratification Theory

    The uses and gratification theory is a framework that seeks to explain why people use media and what they hope to gain from their media consumption. This theory suggests that individuals actively choose and use media to satisfy specific needs and desires. The theory highlights the role of the audience in interpreting and using media content, rather than viewing them as passive receivers of information.

    Several studies have used the uses and gratification theory to examine the motivations and preferences of media users. For example, a study by Katz, Blumler, and Gurevitch (1974) identified four primary functions of media use: diversion, personal relationships, personal identity, and surveillance. The study found that individuals use media to escape from their everyday problems, maintain and enhance social relationships, reinforce their self-identity, and obtain information about the world.

    Another study by Ruggiero (2000) extended the uses and gratification theory to the internet and identified several motivations for internet use, including information seeking, entertainment, social interaction, and personal expression. The study found that individuals use the internet to connect with others, explore new ideas and experiences, and express themselves creatively.

    The uses and gratification theory has been applied to a range of media, including television, radio, newspapers, and social media. The theory has also been used to study the impact of media on social and political attitudes. A study by McLeod, Eveland, and Nathanson (1997) found that media use can affect individuals’ political knowledge, attitudes, and participation.

    In conclusion, the uses and gratification theory provides a useful framework for understanding why people use media and what they hope to gain from their media consumption. The theory highlights the role of the audience in shaping their media experiences and suggests that individuals actively choose and use media to satisfy specific needs and desires.

    References:

    Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, 19-32.

    McLeod, J. M., Eveland, W. P., & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for political action: A test of a model of media use and political action. Communication Research, 24(2), 149-175.

    Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3-37

    , , ,

  • Concepts and Variables

    Concepts and variables are important components of scientific research (Trochim, 2006). Concepts refer to abstract or general ideas that describe or explain phenomena, while variables are measurable attributes or characteristics that can vary across individuals, groups, or situations. Concepts and variables are used to develop research questions, hypotheses, and operational definitions, and to design and analyze research studies. In this essay, I will discuss the concepts and variables that are commonly used in scientific research, with reference to relevant literature.

    One important concept in scientific research is validity, which refers to the extent to which a measure or test accurately reflects the concept or construct it is intended to measure (Carmines & Zeller, 1979). Validity can be assessed in different ways, including face validity, content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. Face validity refers to the extent to which a measure appears to assess the concept it is intended to measure, while content validity refers to the degree to which a measure covers all the important dimensions of the concept. Criterion-related validity involves comparing a measure to an established standard or criterion, while construct validity involves testing the relationship between a measure and other related constructs.

    Another important concept in scientific research is reliability, which refers to the consistency and stability of a measure over time and across different contexts (Trochim, 2006). Reliability can be assessed in different ways, including test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency. Test-retest reliability involves measuring the same individuals on the same measure at different times and examining the degree of consistency between the scores. Inter-rater reliability involves comparing the scores of different raters who are measuring the same variable. Internal consistency involves examining the extent to which different items on a measure are consistent with each other.

    Variables are another important component of scientific research (Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2002). Variables are classified into independent variables, dependent variables, and confounding variables. Independent variables are variables that are manipulated by the researcher in order to test their effects on the dependent variable. Dependent variables are variables that are measured by the researcher in order to assess the effects of the independent variable. Confounding variables are variables that may affect the relationship between the independent and dependent variables and need to be controlled for in order to ensure accurate results.

    In summary, concepts and variables are important components of scientific research, providing a framework for developing research questions, hypotheses, and operational definitions, and designing and analyzing research studies. Validity and reliability are important concepts that help to ensure the accuracy and consistency of research measures, while independent, dependent, and confounding variables are important variables that help to assess the effects of different factors on outcomes. Understanding these concepts and variables is essential for conducting rigorous and effective scientific research.

    , , , , ,

  • Immersiveness Measuring with Scales

    Immersiveness is a key aspect of film that refers to the degree to which viewers feel engaged and absorbed in the cinematic experience (Tamborini, Bowman, Eden, & Grizzard, 2010). Measuring immersiveness in film can be challenging, as it is a subjective experience that can vary across individuals and films (Calleja, 2014). In this discussion, I will explore some of the methods that have been used to measure immersiveness in film, with reference to relevant literature.

    One way to measure immersiveness in film is through the use of self-report measures, which ask viewers to rate their subjective experience of immersion. For example, Tamborini et al. (2010) developed a multidimensional scale of perceived immersive experience in film, which includes items related to spatial presence (e.g., “I felt like I was in the same physical space as the characters”), narrative transportation (e.g., “I was completely absorbed in the story”), and emotional involvement (e.g., “I felt emotionally connected to the characters”). Participants rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater levels of immersiveness. Other self-report measures of immersiveness include the Immersive Experience Questionnaire (Chen, Huang, & Huang, 2020) and the Immersion Questionnaire (Jennett et al., 2008).

    Another way to measure immersiveness in film is through the use of physiological measures, which assess changes in bodily responses associated with immersion. For example, Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) is a measure of the electrical conductance of the skin that can indicate arousal and emotional responses (Kreibig, 2010). Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is another measure that can be used to assess physiological changes associated with immersion, as it reflects the variability in time between successive heartbeats, and is influenced by both parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system activity (Laborde, Mosley, & Thayer, 2017).

    In addition to self-report and physiological measures, behavioral measures can also be used to assess immersiveness in film. For example, eye-tracking can be used to measure the extent to which viewers focus their attention on different elements of the film, such as the characters or the environment (Bulling et al., 2016). Eye-tracking data can also be used to infer cognitive processes associated with immersion, such as mental workload and engagement (Munoz-Montoya, Bohil, Di Stasi, & Gugerty, 2014).

    Overall, measuring immersiveness in film is a complex and multifaceted process that involves subjective, physiological, and behavioral components. Self-report measures are commonly used to assess viewers’ subjective experience of immersion, while physiological measures can provide objective indicators of bodily responses associated with immersion. Behavioral measures, such as eye-tracking, can provide insights into cognitive processes associated with immersion. Combining these different methods can help to provide a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of immersiveness in film.

    References

    Bulling, A., Mansfield, A., & Elsden, C. (2016). Eye tracking and the moving image. Springer.

    Calleja, G. (2014). In-game: From immersion to incorporation. MIT Press.

    Chen, Y.-W., Huang, Y.-J., & Huang, C.-H. (2020). The Immersive Experience Questionnaire: Scale development and validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 49-61.

    Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(9), 641-661.

    Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 394-421.

    Laborde, S., Mosley, E., & Thayer, J. F. (2017). Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research–recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 213.

    Munoz-Montoya, F., Bohil, C. J., Di Stasi, L. L., & Gugerty, L. (2014). Using eye tracking to evaluate the cognitive workload of image processing in a simulated tactical environment. Displays, 35(3), 167-174.

    Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., & Grizzard, M. (2010). Organizing the perception of narrative events: Psychological need satisfaction and narrative immersion. In P. Vorderer, D. Friedrichsen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 165-184). Routledge.

    , , , , ,

  • Hypodermic Needle Theory

    The hypodermic needle theory, also known as the “magic bullet” or “direct effects” model, is a communication theory that suggests that media messages are directly and uniformly injected into the minds of audiences, resulting in a predictable and uniform response (Katz & Lazarsfeld, 1955). According to this theory, audiences are passive and easily influenced by media, and media content can have a direct and immediate impact on their thoughts, beliefs, and behaviors.

    The hypodermic needle theory emerged in the early 20th century, when mass media began to emerge as a powerful force in society. At that time, many researchers believed that media messages had a direct and powerful effect on audiences, and that these effects were largely negative (Lasswell, 1927). The theory was based on the assumption that people were unable to resist the persuasive power of media messages and were therefore vulnerable to manipulation.

    However, the hypodermic needle theory has been widely criticized for its oversimplification of the relationship between media and audiences. Many researchers argue that media effects are far more complex and are influenced by a variety of factors, including audience characteristics, media content, and social context (McQuail, 2010). They also suggest that audiences are not passive recipients of media messages, but rather active interpreters who engage with media content in different ways.

    Critics argue that the hypodermic needle theory overlooks the fact that audiences are not homogeneous and that different people respond to media messages in different ways. They also argue that media content is not always uniform and that different messages can have different effects on different people. In addition, critics argue that the theory ignores the role of other factors, such as social context and personal experience, in shaping media effects (Lull, 2000).

    Despite these criticisms, the hypodermic needle theory has had a lasting impact on the study of media effects and communication. It has inspired numerous studies of media effects, and has led to the development of more sophisticated models of media influence that take into account the complex interplay of audience, media, and social factors (McQuail, 2010).

    Some studies have found support for the hypodermic needle theory, particularly in the context of highly emotional or politically charged messages. For example, a study by Lazarsfeld and his colleagues during the 1940 presidential election found that radio broadcasts had a direct and immediate impact on the voting behavior of listeners (Lazarsfeld, Berelson, & Gaudet, 1944). However, more recent studies have found little support for the theory, and have instead emphasized the importance of individual and contextual factors in shaping media effects (Iyengar & Kinder, 2010).

    Contemporary research on media effects has focused on developing more nuanced models of media influence that take into account the complex interplay of individual, media, and social factors. For example, the cultivation theory suggests that media exposure can shape people’s perceptions of social reality over time, while the agenda-setting theory suggests that media can influence the importance that people attach to different issues (Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Signorelli, 1980; McCombs & Shaw, 1972). These theories, along with many others, have expanded our understanding of media effects and challenged the oversimplified assumptions of the hypodermic needle theory.

    References

    Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorelli, N. (1980). The “mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10-29.

    Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (2010). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.

    Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Transaction Publishers.

    Lasswell, H. D. (1927). The theory of propaganda. American Political Science Review, 21(3), 627-631.

    Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.

    Lull, J. (2000). Inside family viewing: Ethnographic research on television’s audiences. Routledge.

    McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.

    McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. Sage Publications.

    Overall, these references provide a range of sources for further exploration of the hypodermic needle theory and its impact on the field of media studies.

    , , ,