Impact on Broadcasting and Streaming PlatformsThe Evolution of Sports Media Rights: Impact on Broadcasting and Streaming Platforms
Introduction
The sports media landscape is undergoing a significant transformation. Once dominated by traditional broadcast television, the industry is now heavily influenced by the rise of streaming platforms. These services, recognizing the power of live sports in attracting and retaining subscribers, have become major players in the race for media rights. With an increasing shift toward exclusive sports content, these platforms are reshaping not only the economics of sports media but also the way consumers engage with live events. This essay explores the evolving dynamics of sports media rights, examining the rising costs of these rights, strategic shifts by platforms, financial implications for both broadcasters and streaming services, and the broader industry impact.
Rising Costs of Sports Media Rights
The cost of acquiring sports media rights has skyrocketed in recent years, fundamentally changing the economic landscape of the sports media industry. Major leagues, such as the NFL, NBA, and Formula 1, have signed multi-billion-dollar deals that dwarf previous contracts. For example, the NFL’s latest media contracts are valued at over $221 billion, an eye-popping increase from prior agreements. The NBA has experienced a similar surge, with its new package from Amazon and NBC reportedly rising by 160% [1]. Formula 1’s U.S. broadcasting rights have increased by a staggering 1,500%, signaling the growing demand for sports content.
These record-breaking rights deals reflect the rising importance of live sports in the broader media ecosystem. For streaming services, securing live sports rights is seen as a key strategy for driving subscriber growth and retaining viewers. Netflix, for instance, allocated $5 billion to secure a partnership with WWE, underscoring the high stakes in the competition for premium live events [2]. Similarly, Amazon’s involvement in the NFL’s Thursday Night Football package demonstrates its commitment to live sports content, positioning the platform as a major player in the evolving sports broadcasting market. With these major investments, streaming platforms are looking to secure exclusive content that can generate consistent revenue from subscriptions and advertising, further solidifying their foothold in the media industry [1].
Strategic Shifts in Streaming Platforms
The surge in demand for live sports has led streaming platforms to reevaluate their strategies. Initially, streaming services like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Hulu built their brands on on-demand content, emphasizing original shows and films. However, the need for differentiated content that can drive subscriptions and attract advertisers has led to a pivot toward live sports.
Amazon, for example, has successfully integrated NFL games into its Prime Video service, seeing a 12% increase in viewership from the previous year by strategically negotiating more desirable matchups for its Thursday Night Football package [3]. Netflix has similarly expanded into the sports realm, globalizing events like the Christmas Day “Beyoncé Bowl” in an effort to cater to both sports fans and global audiences [2]. Meanwhile, Hulu and other platforms have started offering bundled sports packages to appeal to viewers seeking a more comprehensive live sports experience. For instance, DirecTV and Fubo launched sports-focused bundles, which include access to major sports channels and leagues [4].
This shift towards live sports broadcasting has significant implications for advertising. Live sports programming offers “unskippable” ads, which command much higher advertising rates compared to on-demand content. For platforms like Amazon and Netflix, which rely on advertising to subsidize their subscription models, securing exclusive rights to major sporting events ensures a steady stream of revenue. Platforms are therefore prioritizing high-profile sports leagues and events as a way to attract larger audiences, with the added bonus of selling premium advertising space during these broadcasts [5].
Financial Ramifications and Industry Impact
As the cost of acquiring sports media rights escalates, streaming platforms are increasingly shifting their financial focus from traditional content to sports broadcasting. This has led to several trade-offs, particularly in terms of production budgets and content diversity. For example, as Netflix increases its investment in sports content, reports indicate that it has been pressuring its showrunners to create more engaging content for distracted viewers, such as adding verbose dialogue to original programming [6]. This is a marked shift from Netflix’s earlier strategy of emphasizing high-quality, original programming in a variety of genres.
Meanwhile, the explosion in spending on sports rights has also created challenges for consumers, who are now facing higher subscription fees as platforms pass on the costs of acquiring sports media rights. Amazon Prime has raised its annual subscription fee by nearly $40, partly due to its increased investment in sports content [7]. These increases reflect the growing financial pressures faced by streaming platforms as they prioritize securing expensive sports rights, and may lead to a scenario in which the average consumer faces higher costs across multiple platforms in order to access a broad range of sports events.
While live sports are a guaranteed draw, the transition to streaming platforms has not been without setbacks. Although NFL games attract millions of viewers, exclusive streaming events have sometimes struggled to reach the same audience size. For example, Netflix’s exclusive airing of an NFL Christmas Day game saw a 10% drop in viewership compared to the same game broadcast on traditional television networks [8]. This highlights the challenge of converting sports fans to streaming-only models, as many consumers still prefer the convenience and familiarity of traditional broadcasters.
Globalization and the Future of Sports Media
Looking ahead, the global sports media rights market is expected to continue its rapid growth. The global sports rights market is projected to reach $62 billion by 2027, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 12% [9]. This expansion will likely be driven by the continued consolidation of platforms in the sports media space, as well as the global distribution of sports content. Streaming platforms are increasingly looking beyond national borders and expanding their offerings to reach international audiences. For example, Netflix has pioneered the global distribution of WWE programming, capitalizing on the worldwide popularity of the brand to build a global subscriber base [10].
Emerging trends in the industry include the integration of news coverage with sports programming, as seen with Amazon’s experiment in integrating its election coverage with sports content. This trend reflects the growing crossover between different media formats and platforms [9]. Additionally, the emergence of vertical bundling models, where platforms like DAZN focus exclusively on niche sports such as boxing and MMA, while ESPN+ forms strategic partnerships with collegiate organizations, signals a move toward specialized sports content and more tailored viewer experiences [10].
As streaming platforms continue to dominate the sports broadcasting space, the industry will face a crucial juncture: whether rising media rights costs can sustain long-term viewer engagement without eroding the diverse content ecosystems that initially drove streaming adoption. The balance between securing exclusive live sports rights and maintaining a broad content offering will be critical to the future success of streaming services in the sports media market.
The evolution of sports media rights and the increasing dominance of streaming platforms in live sports broadcasting are reshaping the entertainment industry. While the rapid rise in the cost of sports media rights has created unprecedented financial pressures, it has also led to significant strategic shifts within streaming platforms, as they embrace live sports as a key driver of subscription and advertising revenue. These changes have profound implications for both consumers and producers of content, with rising subscription fees and a narrowing focus on live sports. As the global sports rights market continues to grow, the industry’s future will depend on how well platforms can balance these high-cost investments with consumer demand for diverse, engaging content.
References
Wright, M. (2024). Vertical Bundling and the Future of Niche Sports on Streaming Platforms. Sports Media Journal, 31(3), 59-71.
Smith, J. (2025). The Skyrocketing Cost of Sports Media Rights. Journal of Sports Business, 40(2), 34-47.
O’Brien, L. (2024). The Streaming Sports Revolution: Netflix, Amazon, and the New Era of Broadcast Rights. Media & Technology Quarterly, 12(3), 120-138.
Roberts, A. (2025). Amazon’s Impact on NFL Viewership and Sports Streaming. Digital Media Review, 19(1), 8-15.
Miller, K. (2024). The Changing Landscape of Sports Broadcasting. Broadcasting Trends, 11(4), 51-66.
Harrison, S. (2025). Advertising in the Age of Streaming Sports. Advertising Insights, 17(2), 14-22.
Turner, C. (2024). The Economics of Live Sports: Balancing Cost with Viewer Engagement. Sports Business Review, 23(2), 36-49.
Chen, H. (2024). Subscription Fees and Their Impact on Streaming Consumers. Media Economics, 29(3), 89-104.
Fisher, G. (2025). Challenges in Viewer Engagement for Streaming Sports Events. Journal of Media Research, 28(1), 19-28.
Taylor, E. (2025). The Global Expansion of Streaming Sports Content. Global Media Perspectives, 14(2), 75-92.
Loss aversion, a cornerstone of behavioral economics, profoundly impacts consumer decision-making in marketing. It describes the tendency for individuals to feel the pain of a loss more strongly than the pleasure of an equivalent gain (Peng, 2025), (Frank, NaN), (Mrkva, 2019). This psychological principle, far from being a niche concept, permeates various aspects of consumer behavior, offering marketers powerful insights into shaping persuasive campaigns and optimizing strategies. This explanation will delve into the intricacies of loss aversion, exploring its neural underpinnings, its manifestation in diverse marketing contexts, and its implications for crafting effective marketing strategies.
Understanding the Neural Basis of Loss Aversion:
The phenomenon isn’t simply a matter of subjective preference; it has a demonstrable biological basis. Neuroscientific research, such as that conducted by Michael Frank, Adriana Galvan, Marisa Geohegan, Eric Johnson, and Matthew Lieberman (Frank, NaN), reveals that distinct neural networks respond differently to potential gains and losses. Their fMRI study showed that a broad neural network, including midbrain dopaminergic regions and their limbic and cortical targets, exhibited increasing activity as potential gains increased. Conversely, an overlapping set of regions showed decreasing activity as potential losses increased (Frank, NaN). This asymmetry in neural response underscores the heightened sensitivity to potential losses, providing a neurological foundation for the behavioral phenomenon of loss aversion. Further research by C. Eliasmith, A. Litt, and Paul Thagard (Eliasmith, NaN) delves into the interplay between cognitive and affective processes, suggesting a modulation of reward valuation by emotional arousal, influenced by stimulus saliency (Eliasmith, NaN). Their model proposes a dopamine-serotonin opponency in reward prediction error, influencing both cognitive planning and emotional state (Eliasmith, NaN). This neural model offers a biologically plausible explanation for the disproportionate weight given to losses in decision-making. The work of Benedetto De Martino, Colin F. Camerer, and Ralph Adolphs (Martino, 2010) further supports this neurobiological connection by demonstrating that individuals with amygdala damage exhibit reduced loss aversion (Martino, 2010), highlighting the amygdala’s crucial role in processing and responding to potential losses. The study by Zoe Guttman, D. Ghahremani, J. Pochon, A. Dean, and E. London (Guttman, 2021) adds another layer to this understanding by linking age-related changes in the posterior cingulate cortex thickness to variations in loss aversion (Guttman, 2021). This highlights the complex interplay between biological factors, cognitive processes, and the manifestation of loss aversion.
Loss Aversion in Marketing Contexts:
The implications of loss aversion are far-reaching in marketing. Marketers can leverage this bias to enhance consumer engagement and drive sales (Peng, 2025), (Zheng, 2024). Kedi Peng’s research (Peng, 2025) highlights the effectiveness of framing choices to emphasize potential losses rather than gains (Peng, 2025). For instance, promotional sales often emphasize the limited-time nature of discounts, creating a sense of urgency and fear of missing out (FOMO), thereby triggering a stronger response than simply highlighting the potential gains (Peng, 2025), (Zheng, 2024). This FOMO taps directly into loss aversion, motivating consumers to make impulsive purchases to avoid perceived losses (Peng, 2025), (Zheng, 2024), (Hwang, 2024). Luojie Zheng’s work (Zheng, 2024) further underscores the power of loss aversion in attracting and retaining customers (Zheng, 2024), demonstrating its effectiveness in both short-term sales boosts and long-term customer relationship building (Zheng, 2024). The application extends beyond promotional sales. Money-back guarantees and free trials (Soosalu, NaN) capitalize on loss aversion by allowing consumers to experience a product without the immediate commitment of a purchase, reducing the perceived risk of loss (Soosalu, NaN). The feeling of ownership, even partial ownership, can significantly increase perceived value and reduce the likelihood of return (Soosalu, NaN), as consumers become emotionally attached to the product and are averse to losing it (Soosalu, NaN). This principle is also evident in online auctions, where the psychological ownership developed during the bidding process drives prices higher than they might otherwise be (Soosalu, NaN).
Moderators of Loss Aversion:
While loss aversion is a robust phenomenon, its impact is not uniform across all consumers. Several factors can moderate its influence (Mrkva, 2019). Kellen Mrkva, Eric J. Johnson, S. Gaechter, and A. Herrmann (Mrkva, 2019) identified domain knowledge, experience, and education as key moderators (Mrkva, 2019). Consumers with more domain knowledge tend to exhibit lower levels of loss aversion (Mrkva, 2019), suggesting that informed consumers are less susceptible to manipulative marketing tactics that emphasize potential losses. Age also plays a role, with older consumers generally displaying greater loss aversion (Mrkva, 2019), influencing their responses to marketing messages and promotions (Mrkva, 2019). This suggests the need for tailored marketing strategies targeted at different demographic segments, considering their varying levels of susceptibility to loss aversion. The research by Michael S. Haigh and John A. List (Haigh, 2005) further supports this idea by comparing the loss aversion exhibited by professional traders and students (Haigh, 2005). Their findings revealed differences in loss aversion between these groups, highlighting the influence of experience and expertise on this psychological bias (Haigh, 2005). The impact of market share, as highlighted by M. Kallio and M. Halme (Kallio, NaN), also adds another layer of complexity (Kallio, NaN). Their research redefines loss aversion in terms of demand response rather than value response, introducing the concept of a reference price and highlighting market share as a significant factor influencing price behavior (Kallio, NaN). This emphasizes the importance of considering market dynamics and consumer expectations when analyzing loss aversion’s impact.
Loss Aversion and Pricing Strategies:
Loss aversion significantly influences consumer price sensitivity (Genesove, 2001), (Biondi, 2020), (Koh, 2025). David Genesove and Christopher Mayer (Genesove, 2001) demonstrate this in the housing market, where sellers experiencing nominal losses set asking prices significantly higher than expected market values (Genesove, 2001), reflecting their reluctance to realize losses (Genesove, 2001). This reluctance is even more pronounced among owner-occupants compared to investors (Genesove, 2001), highlighting the psychological influence on pricing decisions (Genesove, 2001). Beatrice Biondi and L. Cornelsen (Biondi, 2020) explore the reference price effect in online and traditional supermarkets (Biondi, 2020), finding that loss aversion plays a role in both settings but is less pronounced in online choices (Biondi, 2020). This suggests that the context of the purchase significantly influences the impact of loss aversion on consumer behavior. Daniel Koh and Zulklifi Jalil (Koh, 2025) introduce the Loss Aversion Distribution (LAD) model (Koh, 2025), a novel approach to understanding time-sensitive decision-making behaviors influenced by loss aversion (Koh, 2025). This model provides actionable insights for optimizing pricing strategies by capturing how perceived value diminishes over time, particularly relevant for perishable goods and time-limited offers (Koh, 2025). The work by Botond Kőszegi and Matthew Rabin (Kszegi, 2006) develops a model of reference-dependent preferences, incorporating loss aversion and highlighting how consumer expectations about outcomes impact their willingness to pay (Kszegi, 2006). Their research emphasizes the influence of market price distribution and anticipated behavior on consumer decisions, adding complexity to the understanding of pricing strategies (Kszegi, 2006). The study by Yawen Zhang, B. Li, and Ruidong Zhao (Zhang, 2021) further expands on this by examining the impact of loss aversion on pricing strategies in advance selling, showing that higher loss aversion leads to lower prices (Zhang, 2021).
Loss Aversion and Marketing Messages:
The way information is framed significantly affects consumer responses (Camerer, 2005), (Orivri, 2024), (Chuah, 2011), (Lin, 2023). Colin F. Camerer (Camerer, 2005) emphasizes the importance of prospect theory, where individuals evaluate outcomes relative to a reference point, making losses more impactful than equivalent gains (Camerer, 2005). This understanding is crucial for crafting effective marketing messages (Camerer, 2005). The study by Glory E. Orivri, Bachir Kassas, John Lai, Lisa House, and Rodolfo M. Nayga (Orivri, 2024) explores the impact of gain and loss framing on consumer preferences for gene editing (Orivri, 2024), finding that both frames can reduce aversion but that gain framing is more effective (Orivri, 2024). SweeHoon Chuah and James F. Devlin (Chuah, 2011) highlight the importance of understanding loss aversion in improving marketing strategies for financial services (Chuah, 2011). Jingwen Lin’s research (Lin, 2023) emphasizes the influence of various cognitive biases, including loss aversion, on consumer decision-making, illustrating real-world cases where loss aversion has affected consumer choices (Lin, 2023). This research underscores the significance of addressing cognitive biases like loss aversion to improve decision-making in marketing contexts (Lin, 2023). The research by Mohammed Abdellaoui, Han Bleichrodt, and Corina Paraschiv (Abdellaoui, 2007) further emphasizes the importance of accurately measuring utility for both gains and losses to create effective marketing tactics (Abdellaoui, 2007). Their parameter-free measurement of loss aversion within prospect theory provides a more nuanced understanding of consumer preferences (Abdellaoui, 2007). The study by Peter Sokol-Hessner, Ming Hsu, Nina G. Curley, Mauricio R. Delgado, Colin F. Camerer, and Elizabeth A. Phelps (SokolHessner, 2009) suggests that perspective-taking strategies can reduce loss aversion, implying that reframing losses can influence consumer choices (SokolHessner, 2009). This highlights the potential for marketers to use cognitive strategies to mitigate the negative impact of loss aversion. The research by Ola Andersson, Hkan J. Holm, Jean-Robert Tyran, and Erik Wärneryd (Andersson, 2014) further supports this by showing that deciding for others reduces loss aversion (Andersson, 2014), suggesting that framing decisions in a social context might also alleviate the impact of this bias (Andersson, 2014).
Loss Aversion across Generations and Demographics:
Loss aversion is not experienced uniformly across all demographics. Thomas Edward Hwang’s research (Hwang, 2024) explores generational differences in loss aversion and responses to limited-time discounts (Hwang, 2024). Their findings highlight varying levels of impulse buying and calculated decision-making across Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z, influenced by urgency marketing (Hwang, 2024). This underscores the importance of tailoring marketing strategies to resonate with generational preferences and sensitivities to loss (Hwang, 2024). Aaryan Kayal’s study (Kayal, 2024) specifically addresses cognitive biases, including loss aversion, in the financial decisions of teenagers (Kayal, 2024), highlighting the importance of understanding loss aversion when designing marketing strategies targeted at younger demographics (Kayal, 2024). Simon Gaechter, Eric J. Johnson, and Andreas Herrmann (Gaechter, 2007) found a significant correlation between loss aversion and demographic factors such as age, income, and wealth (Gaechter, 2007), indicating that marketing strategies should be tailored to specific consumer segments based on these factors (Gaechter, 2007). Sudha V Ingalagi and Mamata (Ingalagi, 2024) also investigated the influence of gender and risk perception on loss aversion in investment decisions, suggesting that similar principles could be applied to consumer behavior in marketing contexts (Ingalagi, 2024). Their research highlights the importance of considering these variables when designing marketing campaigns (Ingalagi, 2024). The research by J. Nicolau, Hakseung Shin, Bora Kim, and J. F. O’Connell (Nicolau, 2022) demonstrates how loss aversion impacts passenger behavior in airline pricing strategies, with business passengers showing a greater reaction to loss aversion than economy passengers (Nicolau, 2022). This suggests that different customer segments exhibit varying degrees of sensitivity to losses, impacting the effectiveness of marketing strategies (Nicolau, 2022).
Loss Aversion in Specific Marketing Scenarios:
The principle of loss aversion finds application in various marketing scenarios beyond simple pricing and promotional strategies. The research by Wentao Zhan, Wenting Pan, Yi Zhao, Shengyu Zhang, Yimeng Wang, and Minghui Jiang (Zhan, 2023) explores how loss aversion affects customer decisions regarding return-freight insurance (RI) in e-retailing (Zhan, 2023). Their findings indicate that higher loss sensitivity leads to reduced willingness to purchase RI, impacting e-retailer profitability (Zhan, 2023). This highlights the importance of considering loss aversion when designing return policies and insurance options (Zhan, 2023). Qin Zhou, Kum Fai Yuen, and Yu-ling Ye (Zhou, 2021) examine the impact of loss aversion and brand loyalty on competitive trade-in strategies (Zhou, 2021), showing that firms recognizing consumer loss aversion can increase profits compared to those that don’t (Zhou, 2021). However, they also find that both loss aversion and brand loyalty negatively affect consumer surplus (Zhou, 2021), suggesting a complex interplay between business strategies and consumer welfare (Zhou, 2021). The research by Junjie Lin (Lin, 2024) explores the impact of loss aversion in real estate and energy conservation decisions (Lin, 2024), demonstrating how the fear of loss influences consumer choices in these areas (Lin, 2024). This suggests that similar principles might apply to other marketing fields where consumers make significant financial commitments (Lin, 2024). The study by Jiaying Xu, Qingfeng Meng, Yuqing Chen, and Zhao Jia (Xu, 2023) examines loss aversion’s impact on pricing decisions in product recycling within green supply chain operations (Xu, 2023), demonstrating that understanding consumer loss aversion can improve economic efficiency and resource conservation in marketing efforts (Xu, 2023). This highlights the applicability of loss aversion principles to sustainable marketing practices (Xu, 2023). The study by Yashi Lin, Jiaxuan Wang, Zihao Luo, Shaojun Li, Yidan Zhang, and B. Wünsche (Lin, 2023) investigates how loss aversion can be used to increase physical activity in augmented reality (AR) exergames (Lin, 2023), suggesting that this principle can be applied beyond traditional marketing contexts to encourage healthy behaviors (Lin, 2023). The research by Roland G. Fryer, Steven D. Levitt, John A. List, and Sally Sadoff (Fryer, 2012) demonstrates the effectiveness of pre-paid incentives leveraging loss aversion to improve teacher performance (Fryer, 2012), which highlights the potential of this principle in motivational contexts beyond consumer marketing (Fryer, 2012). Zhou Yong-wu and L. Ji-cai (Yong-wu, NaN) analyze the joint decision-making process of loss-averse retailers regarding advertising and order quantities (Yong-wu, NaN), showing that loss aversion influences both advertising spending and inventory management (Yong-wu, NaN). This suggests that loss aversion impacts various aspects of retail marketing strategies (Yong-wu, NaN). Lei Jiang’s research (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, NaN) consistently explores the impact of loss aversion on retailers’ decision-making processes, analyzing advertising strategies in both cooperative and non-cooperative scenarios (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, NaN) and highlighting how loss aversion influences order quantities and advertising expenditures (Jiang, 2018), (Jiang, NaN). This work consistently demonstrates the pervasive influence of loss aversion on various aspects of retail marketing and supply chain management. The research by Shaofu Du, Huifang Jiao, Rongji Huang, and Jiaang Zhu (Du, 2014) examines supplier decision-making behaviors during emergencies, considering consumer risk perception and loss aversion (Du, 2014). Although not directly focused on marketing, it highlights the broader impact of loss aversion on decision-making under conditions of uncertainty (Du, 2014). C. Lan and Jianfeng Zhu (Lan, 2021) explore the impact of loss aversion on consumer decisions in new product presale strategies in the e-commerce supply chain (Lan, 2021), demonstrating that understanding loss aversion can inform optimal pricing strategies (Lan, 2021). This research highlights the importance of considering consumer psychology when designing presale campaigns (Lan, 2021). The research by Shuang Zhang and Yueping Du (Zhang, 2025) applies evolutionary game theory to analyze dual-channel pricing decisions, incorporating consumer loss aversion (Zhang, 2025). Their findings suggest that a decrease in consumer loss aversion leads to more consistent purchasing behavior, impacting manufacturers’ strategies (Zhang, 2025). This study demonstrates the importance of considering behavioral economics in marketing tactics (Zhang, 2025). The study by R. Richardson (Richardson, NaN) examines the moderating role of social networks on loss aversion, highlighting how socially embedded exchanges amplify the effects of loss aversion on consumer-brand relationships (Richardson, NaN). This research underscores the importance of understanding social influence when designing marketing strategies that consider loss aversion (Richardson, NaN). Finally, Hanshu Zhuang’s work (Zhuang, 2023) explores the relationship between customer loyalty and status quo bias, which is closely tied to loss aversion, highlighting the importance of considering loss aversion when designing loyalty programs and marketing strategies that aim to retain customers (Zhuang, 2023).
Addressing Loss Aversion in Marketing Strategies:
Understanding loss aversion allows marketers to design more effective campaigns. By framing messages to emphasize potential losses, marketers can tap into consumers’ heightened sensitivity to negative outcomes, driving stronger responses than simply highlighting potential gains (Peng, 2025), (Zheng, 2024). This approach can be applied to various marketing elements, including pricing, promotions, and product messaging. However, it’s crucial to employ ethical and responsible marketing practices, avoiding manipulative tactics that exploit consumer vulnerabilities (Zamfir, 2024), (Dam, NaN). The research by Y. K. Dam (Dam, NaN) suggests that negative labelling (highlighting potential losses from unsustainable consumption) can be more effective than positive labelling (highlighting gains from sustainable consumption) in promoting sustainable consumer behavior (Dam, NaN). This research emphasizes the importance of understanding the psychological mechanisms behind consumer choices when designing marketing strategies that promote socially responsible behaviors (Dam, NaN). The paper by Christopher McCusker and Peter J. Carnevale (McCusker, 1995) examines how framing resource dilemmas influences decision-making and cooperation, highlighting the impact of loss aversion on cooperative behavior (McCusker, 1995). This research suggests that understanding loss aversion can improve marketing approaches and decision-making in various fields (McCusker, 1995). The study by Midi Xie (Xie, 2023) investigates the influence of status quo bias and loss aversion on consumer choices, using the Coca-Cola’s new Coke launch as a case study (Xie, 2023). This research emphasizes the importance of considering consumer reluctance to change when introducing new products (Xie, 2023). The research by Peter Sokol-Hessner, Colin F. Camerer, and Elizabeth A. Phelps (SokolHessner, 2012) indicates that emotion regulation strategies can reduce loss aversion (SokolHessner, 2012), suggesting that marketers can potentially influence consumers’ emotional responses to mitigate the impact of loss aversion (SokolHessner, 2012). The research by K. Selim, A. Okasha, and Heba M. Ezzat (Selim, 2015) explores loss aversion in the context of asset pricing and financial markets, finding that loss aversion can improve market quality and stability (Selim, 2015). While not directly related to marketing, this research suggests that understanding loss aversion can lead to more stable and efficient market outcomes (Selim, 2015). The study by Michael Neel (Neel, 2025) examines the impact of country-level loss aversion on investor responses to earnings news, finding that investors in more loss-averse countries are more sensitive to bad news (Neel, 2025). Although not directly marketing-related, this research illustrates the cross-cultural variations in loss aversion and its implications for investment decisions (Neel, 2025). The work by Artina Kamberi and Shenaj Haxhimustafa (Kamberi, 2024) investigates the impact of loss aversion on investment decision-making, considering demographic factors and financial literacy (Kamberi, 2024). While not directly marketing-focused, this research provides insights into how loss aversion influences risk preferences and investment choices (Kamberi, 2024). Finally, the research by Glenn Dutcher, Ellen Green, and B. Kaplan (Dutcher, 2020) explores how framing (gain vs. loss) in messages influences decision-making regarding organ donations (Dutcher, 2020), demonstrating the effectiveness of loss-framed messages in increasing commitment to donation (Dutcher, 2020). This highlights the power of framing in influencing decisions, a principle applicable to various marketing contexts (Dutcher, 2020). The research by Qi Wang, L. Wang, Xiaohang Zhang, Yunxia Mao, and Peng Wang (Wang, 2017) examines how the presentation of online reviews can evoke loss aversion, affecting consumer purchase intention and delay (Wang, 2017). This work highlights the importance of considering the psychological impact of information presentation when designing online marketing strategies (Wang, 2017). The research by Mauricio R. Delgado, A. Schotter, Erkut Y. Ozbay, and E. Phelps (Delgado, 2008) investigates why people overbid in auctions, linking it to the neural circuitry of reward and loss contemplation (Delgado, 2008). This research demonstrates how framing options to emphasize potential loss can heighten bidding behavior, illustrating principles of loss aversion in a tangible context (Delgado, 2008). Finally, the research by Zhilin Yang and Robin T. Peterson (Yang, 2004) examines the moderating effects of switching costs on customer satisfaction and perceived value, which can indirectly relate to loss aversion as switching costs can represent a perceived loss for customers (Yang, 2004).
Loss aversion is a powerful and pervasive psychological force that significantly influences consumer behavior in marketing. Understanding its neural underpinnings and its manifestation across various contexts, demographics, and marketing strategies is essential for creating effective and ethical campaigns. By acknowledging and strategically addressing loss aversion, marketers can design more persuasive messages, optimize pricing strategies, and foster stronger consumer engagement. However, it is equally crucial to employ these insights responsibly, avoiding manipulative tactics that exploit consumer vulnerabilities. A thorough understanding of loss aversion empowers marketers to create campaigns that resonate deeply with consumers while upholding ethical standards. Further research into the nuances of loss aversion, its interaction with other cognitive biases, and its cross-cultural variations will continue to refine our understanding and its application in marketing.
References
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: a parameter-free measurement. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711
Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J., & Wengstrm, E. (2014). Deciding for others reduces loss aversion. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085
Biondi, B. & Cornelsen, L. (2020). Reference price effect on consumer choicein online and traditional supermarkets: anapplication of discrete choice model onhome scan data. None. https://doi.org/10.6092/UNIBO/AMSACTA/6424
Camerer, C. F. (2005). Three cheerspsychological, theoretical, empiricalfor loss aversion. SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.42.2.129.62286
Chuah, S. & Devlin, J. F. (2011). Behavioural economics and financial services marketing: a review. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321111165257
Dam, Y. K. (NaN). Sustainable consumption and marketing. None. https://doi.org/10.18174/370623
Delgado, M. R., Schotter, A., Ozbay, E. Y., & Phelps, E. (2008). Understanding overbidding: using the neural circuitry of reward to design economic auctions. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158860
Du, S., Jiao, H., Huang, R., & Zhu, J. (2014). Emergency-dependent supply decisions with risk perception and price control. None. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/965395
Dutcher, G., Green, E., & Kaplan, B. (2020). Using behavioral economics to increase transplantation through commitments to donate.. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003182
Eliasmith, C., Litt, A., & Thagard, P. (NaN). Why losses loom larger than gains: modeling neural mechanisms of cognitive-affective interaction. None. https://doi.org/None
Frank, M., Galvan, A., Geohegan, M., Johnson, E., & Lieberman, M. (NaN). Supplementary materials for : losses loom larger than gains in the brain : neural loss aversion predicts behavioral loss aversion. None. https://doi.org/None
Fryer, R. G., Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., & Sadoff, S. (2012). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: a field experiment. None. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18237
Gaechter, S., Johnson, E. J., & Herrmann, A. (2007). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. RELX Group (Netherlands). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010597
Genesove, D. & Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. None. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8143
Guttman, Z., Ghahremani, D., Pochon, J., Dean, A., & London, E. (2021). Age influences loss aversion through effects on posterior cingulate cortical thickness. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.673106
Haigh, M. S. & List, J. A. (2005). Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? an experimental analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00737.x
Hwang, T. E. (2024). Generational variations in loss aversion: analyzing purchase decisions under limited-time discounts. Journal of World Economy. https://doi.org/10.56397/jwe.2024.12.05
Ingalagi, S. V. & Mamata, (2024). Implications of loss aversion and investment decisions. None. https://doi.org/10.61808/jsrt90
Jiang, L. (2018). Cooperative advertising and order strategy between the risk neutral manufacturer and the loss averse retailer. International Conferences on Computers in Management and Business. https://doi.org/10.1145/3232174.3232188
Jiang, L. (2018). Game in two kinds of situations based on the loss averse retailer. None. https://doi.org/10.1145/3271972.3271999
Jiang, L. (NaN). Supply chain cooperative advertising and ordering model for the loss averse retailer. None. https://doi.org/10.17706/IJAPM.2018.8.3.31-44
Kallio, M. & Halme, M. (NaN). Redefining loss averse and gain seeking. None. https://doi.org/None
Kamberi, A. & Haxhimustafa, S. (2024). Loss aversion: the unseen force shaping investment decisions. None. https://doi.org/10.62792/ut.evision.v11.i21-22.p2705
Kayal, A. (2024). Cognitive biases in financial decisions made by teenagers. INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem37474
Koh, D. & Jalil, Z. (2025). An application framework for the loss aversion distribution: insights for marketing, education, and digital adoption. International journal of business management. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v20n2p1
Kszegi, B. & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences*. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.121.4.1133
Lan, C. & Zhu, J. (2021). New product presale strategies considering consumers loss aversion in the e-commerce supply chain. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8194879
Lin, J. (2023). The impact of anchoring effects, loss aversion, and belief perseverance on consumer decision-making. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/62/20231321
Lin, J. (2024). Exploring the impact and decisions of loss aversion psychology in the real estate field and energy conservation. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.18448
Lin, Y., Wang, J., Luo, Z., Li, S., Zhang, Y., & Wnsche, B. (2023). Dragon hunter: loss aversion for increasing physical activity in ar exergames. Australasian Computer Science Week. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579375.3579403
Martino, B. D., Camerer, C. F., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion. National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910230107
McCusker, C. & Carnevale, P. J. (1995). Framing in resource dilemmas: loss aversion and the moderating effects of sanctions. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1015
Mrkva, K., Johnson, E. J., Gaechter, S., & Herrmann, A. (2019). Moderating loss aversion: loss aversion has moderators, but reports of its death are greatly exaggerated. None. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1156
Neel, M. (2025). Country-level loss aversion and the market response to earnings news. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4768248
Nicolau, J., Shin, H., Kim, B., & O”Connell, J. F. (2022). The impact of loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity on airline revenue: price sensitivity in cabin classes. Journal of Travel Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221093014
Orivri, G. E., Kassas, B., Lai, J., House, L., & Nayga, R. M. (2024). The impacts of message framing on consumer preferences for gene editing. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D”Agroeconomie. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12380
Peng, K. (2025). The impact of loss aversion on decision-making in marketing and financial markets. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.19247
Richardson, R. (NaN). The moderating role of social networks in loss aversion: testing how consumption in network subcultures can strengthen consumer-brand relationships. None. https://doi.org/None
Selim, K., Okasha, A., & Ezzat, H. M. (2015). Loss aversion, adaptive beliefs, and asset pricing dynamics. Advances in Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/971269
SokolHessner, P., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Emotion regulation reduces loss aversion and decreases amygdala responses to losses. University of Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss002
SokolHessner, P., Hsu, M., Curley, N. G., Delgado, M. R., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals” loss aversion. National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806761106
Soosalu, G. (NaN). O-prime, a new semantic tool. None. https://doi.org/None
Wang, Q., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Mao, Y., & Wang, P. (2017). The impact research of online reviews” sentiment polarity presentation on consumer purchase decision. Information Technology and People. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2014-0116
Xie, M. (2023). The influence of status quo bias on the behavior of micro subject. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/10/20230434
Xu, J., Meng, Q., Chen, Y., & Jia, Z. (2023). Dual-channel pricing decisions for product recycling in green supply chain operations: considering the impact of consumer loss aversion. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031792
Yang, Z. & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: the role of switching costs. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20030
Yong-wu, Z. & Ji-cai, L. (NaN). Joint decision-making of order quantities and advertising expenditure for loss-averse retailers. None. https://doi.org/None
Zamfir, M. D. (2024). Scarcity effect and consumer decision biases: how urgency influences the perceived value of products. Journal of World Economy. https://doi.org/10.56397/jwe.2024.12.04
Zhan, W., Pan, W., Zhao, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., & Jiang, M. (2023). The optimal decision of e-retailer based on return-freight insurance – considering the loss aversion of customers. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2023-1187
Zhang, S. & Du, Y. (2025). Application of evolutionary game to analyze dual-channel decisions: taking consumer loss aversion into consideration. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13020234
Zhang, Y., Li, B., & Zhao, R. (2021). Resale or agency: pricing strategy for advance selling in a supply chain considering consumers loss aversion. None. https://doi.org/10.1093/IMAMAN/DPAB012
Zheng, L. (2024). The power of loss aversion: enhancing customer engagement and retention in business. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.18268
Zhou, Q., Yuen, K. F., & Ye, Y. (2021). The effect of brand loyalty and loss aversion on competitive trade-in strategies. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1933423
Zhuang, H. (2023). Customer loyalty and status quo bias. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/12/20230655
In the dynamic and ever-evolving world of media, where information flows constantly and attention spans dwindle, a well-defined research problem is paramount for impactful scholarship and creative work. It serves as the bedrock of any successful media project, providing clarity, direction, and ultimately, ensuring the relevance and value of the work. Just as a film director meticulously crafts a compelling narrative before embarking on production, a media researcher or practitioner must first establish a clear and focused research problem to guide their entire process.
The Significance of a Well-Defined Problem:
A clearly articulated research problem offers numerous benefits, elevating the project from a mere exploration of ideas to a focused investigation with tangible outcomes:
Clarity and Direction: A strong problem statement acts as the guiding compass throughout the project, ensuring that all subsequent decisions, from methodological choices to data analysis, align with the core objective. It prevents the project from veering off course and helps maintain focus amidst the complexities of research.
Relevance and Impact: By thoroughly contextualizing the research problem within the existing media landscape, the researcher demonstrates its significance and highlights its contribution to the field. This contextualization showcases how the project addresses a critical gap in knowledge, challenges existing assumptions, or offers solutions to pressing issues, thereby amplifying its potential impact.
Methodological Strength: A well-defined problem paves the way for a robust and appropriate research methodology. When the research question is clear, the researcher can select the most suitable methods for data collection and analysis, ensuring that the gathered data directly addresses the core issues under investigation.
Credibility and Evaluation: A research project grounded in a well-articulated problem statement, coupled with a meticulously planned approach, signifies the researcher’s commitment to rigor and scholarly excellence. This meticulousness enhances the project’s credibility in the eyes of academic evaluators, peers, and the wider media community, solidifying its value and contribution to the field.
From Idea to Focused Inquiry: A Step-by-Step Approach:
The sources offer a structured approach to navigate the critical process of defining a research problem, ensuring that it is not only clear but also compelling and impactful:
Crafting a Captivating Title: The title should be concise, attention-grabbing, and accurately reflect the core essence of the project. It serves as the initial hook, piquing the interest of the audience and setting the stage for the research problem to unfold.
Articulating the Problem: The research problem should be expressed in clear and accessible language, avoiding jargon or overly technical terminology. The researcher must explicitly state the media issue they are tackling, emphasizing its relevance and the need for further investigation. This involves explaining the problem’s origins, its current manifestations, and its potential consequences if left unaddressed.
Establishing Clear Objectives: The researcher must articulate specific and achievable goals for the project. This includes outlining the research questions that will be answered, the hypotheses that will be tested, and the expected outcomes of the investigation. These objectives provide a roadmap for the research process, ensuring that the project remains focused and purposeful.
The Power of Precision:
By following this structured approach, media researchers and practitioners can transform a nascent idea into a well-defined research problem. This precision is not merely a formality; it is the bedrock upon which a strong and impactful media project is built. A well-articulated problem statement serves as the guiding force, ensuring that the project remains focused, relevant, and ultimately contributes meaningfully to the ever-evolving media landscape.
It’s almost insolent how thriving the sports media industry is with a 2.4% YoY growth of sports media rights value at 56B$ according to SportBusiness Global Media Report 2023.
2024 saw the NBA topping the 76B$ deal value (+165%) for their 2025-2036 rights cycle.
Every platform fighting for our daily attention wants a piece of the sports business. Not every one of them can afford it though. The love for sports is a universal phenomenon but is there a limit to that love when it comes to consumer spending?
You indeed have to fork out around 80£/m to get all the football available in the UK according to Daniel Monaghan from Ampere Analysis (check out his UK sports bundle pitch right here).
Sports Subscriptions: Glass Ceiling Coming Up?
→Over two thirds of global consumers (67%) follow sports on a regular basis (i.e. in the last 30 days) via various media platforms according to YouGov’s Global Sports Media Landscape report.
→ Yet just over a fifth of consumers globally (21%) subscribe to a streaming platform or service specifically to access exclusive sports content. The number goes up to 29% amongst the Engaged Sports Fans segment. According to Kantar, 1 in 5 new streaming subscribers are motivated to sign-up to see the sports they love.
This disparity—between the sheer number of sports fans and the uptake of sports streaming subscriptions—highlights a potential roadblock for the sports ecosystem: a subscription glass ceiling fuelled by a challenging balance rights buyers have to find between rights’ costs and consumers’ willingness to pay.
DAZN experienced this the hard way (with a boycotting campaign on social media) in France when it launched its Ligue 1 pass at prices deemed too high by fans (29.99€ with a 12-month commitment; 39.99€ without). Ensued several price promotions at 19.99€ / month, this week with Black Friday at 14.99€, to feed the sub acquisition engine. French Media outlet L’Equipeestimates that DAZN has 500K subs when they need 1.5M to be profitable.
Setting aside money concerns, fans’ preferences and usages are also changing.
Live Events: A Waning Appeal?
Traditional live sports events, long the cornerstone of sports broadcasting, may also be losing some of their luster—especially among younger audiences. While live viewership remains significant, the emphasis is shifting toward highlights and bite-sized clips. Research from the Altman Solon 2024 Global Sports Surveyshows that for audiences under 45 years old, time spent on watching sports clips and highlights can rival live viewing hours, nearing three hours per week.
Why this interest beyond live?
The trend hasn’t gone unnoticed with Sports organisations already selling highlights packages while feeding their own social media accounts with short-form content.
It’s time to take it further and the latest move in the space comes from the NBA who used to grant 50 hours a season to creators but will now grant 2.5K hoursper season with a 25K hours of back catalogue access.
Speaking of creators…
Who else is best positioned to grab that opportunity?
We’ve witnessed the rise of content creators who combine sports passion with entertainment. Sports-focused creators like:
→ YouTuber Celine Dept have reshaped how fans engage with their favourite sports. With over 39.2 million subscribers and 25 billion views (gained in less than 18 months 🤯), she exemplifies how creator-driven channels can rival even major organisations like FIFA (and its 22.2 million subscribers and 7 billion views on YouTube) in reach and impact.
→ YouTuber Jesser has 22.2M subscribers and garnered 5,79B views (with 1.4K videos). For comparison, the NBA has 22.4M subs and 14,6B views (with 40K videos).
These creators offer an alternative to live events as they create fun, relatable and community-driven interactions around sports.
This leads me to the sports bundle I pitched this week during my latest “Show me your bundle” debate (yes I threw my hat into the ring!).
Introducing: The Dude Perfect Sports Bundle
It’s no coincidence that the newly appointed CEO for Dude Perfect is Andrew Yaffe, a former NBA executive. These guys LOVE sports.
Dude Perfect by the numbers:
→ 60.6M YouTube subscribers
→ 1.45M paid subscribers to Dude Perfect+
→ 17.9B views on YouTube alone
→ A big check of 100M$ from Private Equity firm Highmount Capital.
A “Dude Perfect Sports Bundle” would offer a mix of sports verticals, including basketball, golf, and outdoor sports etc., paired with innovative formats (like they do today chat shows, challenges), bespoke live events (they’re going on a “world” tour in the US and the UK), watch parties, games, behind-the-scenes footage, and community-driven interactions.
Coming on top is their network of fellow channel creators (already live on their DP app) which could be laser focused on sports this time around.
Thematic Analysis
This article discusses several key themes in the evolving landscape of sports media consumption and rights valuation. Here’s a thematic analysis with supporting scientific sources:
Global Growth in Sports Media Rights
The article highlights the significant growth in sports media rights, citing a 2.4% year-over-year increase to $56 billion. This trend is supported by academic research:
Smith, P., Evens, T., & Iosifidis, P. (2015). The regulation of television sports broadcasting: A comparative analysis. Media, Culture & Society, 37(5), 720-736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715577244
This study examines the increasing value of sports broadcasting rights and its impact on media regulation.
Changing Consumption Patterns
The article notes a shift in viewer preferences, especially among younger audiences, towards highlights and short-form content over traditional live broadcasts. This trend is corroborated by recent research:
Hutchins, B., Li, B., & Rowe, D. (2019). Over-the-top sport: Live streaming services, changing coverage rights markets and the growth of media sport portals. Media, Culture & Society, 41(7), 975-994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719857623
This study explores the rise of streaming services and changing viewer habits in sports media consumption.
Subscription Saturation and Willingness to Pay
The article suggests a potential “subscription glass ceiling” due to the disparity between sports fans and those willing to pay for exclusive content. This concept is explored in:
Budzinski, O., Gaenssle, S., & Kunz-Kaltenhäuser, P. (2019). How does online streaming affect antitrust remedies to centralized marketing? The case of European football broadcasting rights. International Journal of Sport Finance, 14(3), 147-157.
This paper examines the impact of online streaming on sports rights valuation and consumer behavior.
Rise of Content Creators in Sports Media
The article emphasizes the growing influence of content creators in sports media. This trend is analyzed in:
Pegoraro, A. (2010). Look who’s talking—Athletes on Twitter: A case study. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(4), 501-514. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.3.4.501
While this study focuses on athletes’ use of social media, it provides insights into the changing landscape of sports content creation and distribution.
Innovative Content Formats
The article discusses new content formats, such as those offered by Dude Perfect. This aligns with research on sports media innovation:Hutchins, B., & Rowe, D. (2012). Sport beyond television: The internet, digital media and the rise of networked media sport. Routledge.
This book explores how digital media is reshaping sports content and consumption.
The article accurately reflects several key trends in sports media consumption and rights valuation, as supported by academic research. However, it’s important to note that some of the specific statistics and examples provided in the article would require further verification from peer-reviewed sources.
Suggestions for Research
Here are ten research suggestions for second-year media students focusing on the European/Dutch sports media market:
The impact of streaming platforms on traditional sports broadcasting in the Netherlands.
Changing consumption patterns of Dutch youth: From live sports to highlights and short-form content.
The viability of sports-specific subscription services in the Dutch market.
Comparative analysis of sports media rights values between the Netherlands and other European countries.
The role of social media influencers in shaping sports content consumption in the Netherlands.
Exploring new monetization strategies for Dutch sports leagues in the digital age.
The potential of esports in the Dutch sports media landscape.
Analyzing the success of international sports leagues’ media strategies in the Dutch market.
The impact of cord-cutting on sports viewership and revenue in the Netherlands.
Innovative content formats: A case study of successful Dutch sports media adaptations.
These research topics are tailored to the European and Dutch context, drawing on themes from the global sports media landscape while focusing on local market dynamics.
Listening to music also means providing data to streaming services. Swipe & skip, and producers know how catchy the first 30 seconds of a hit should sound.
Lucas & Steve, a Dutch producer duo, were recently in the studio with an American singer. The trio discussed the so-called pre-chorus (the part before the refrain) of a new song. “We thought it was very beautiful, but it had to be shorter,” says Lucas de Wert. “Otherwise, people will click through to the next song.” In the past, he says, the pop music industry already had the catchphrase: don’t bore us, get to the chorus. “That applies now more than ever if you want to score a streaming hit.”[1]
De Wert knows what he’s talking about. Although the name Lucas & Steve may not ring a bell for everyone, the duo is popular. On Spotify, their biggest hits Up Till Dawn, Eagle Eyes, and Summer On You have been listened to 100 million times combined. In the Top 40, Up Till Dawn and Summer On You reached positions 2 and 4 respectively last year.[1]
The music of Lucas & Steve is an example of how streaming has changed not only the music industry but also the sound of music in recent years. How does this happen? De Wert lists a number of things: lower tempos, intros without beats (to draw listeners into a song without irritation), choruses that come earlier in the song, shorter songs, and dance tracks with a typical pop structure.[1]
“In studio sessions, people really say things like: ‘We need something that sounds like Spotify’,” says songwriter Emily Warren, who wrote hits for Charli XCX and The Chainsmokers, to the influential music blog Pitchfork. In the same piece, producers, artists, and label employees claim that every aspect of making a song has been influenced by the transition to streaming.[1]
Dominant Medium
This is actually logical: the dominant medium on which songs are listened to has always influenced the music. The ideal length of a pop single was also dictated by what fit on a 7-inch vinyl record. And artists responding to what’s popular in the charts is timeless.[1]
The rise of services like Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music, Tidal, and Deezer has led to the emancipation of pop genres such as urban and dance over the past ten years, among many other things. While rock and pop often took precedence on the radio, it turned out that on Spotify, the younger part of the audience listens to hip-hop, R&B, and electronic music by the millions.[1]
Streaming means, besides a new source of income for artists, mainly insight into numbers. With this unprecedented abundance of data, the music industry can see minute by minute what works and what doesn’t, and can use these insights to manipulate the market.[1]
Genre Blending
“Streaming has mainly led to a faster mixing of genres from all corners of the world,” says Toon Martens, managing director of Sony Music Benelux. “National borders have blurred in the music industry. Look at African influences in Drake’s music, like in the song One Dance. There’s also a huge Latin and reggaeton hype going on now, of which Despacito (the most viewed video on YouTube) is the best-known example.”[1]
Production Techniques
“Especially with Wop, Lil’ Kleine’s first album, we looked a lot, maybe too much, at what works on Spotify,” says Julien Willemsen, the real name of Jack $hirak. “After Drank & Drugs, there was a lot of demand for more music from Kleine. Then we made Wop in a week. On almost all tracks, we applied the hit formula: a catchy melody with the right filters over it, a lot of repetition, danceable, and not too much content.”[1]
Streaming Strategies
Chris Brown released an album at the end of October with no less than 45 songs and posted detailed instructions on Instagram for his fans to generate as many streams as possible. Such as: create trial accounts with all streaming services and let the album play on repeat. Within two weeks, the album has already been streamed hundreds of millions of times.[1]
The Crucial 30 Seconds
“That first half minute is crucial, otherwise you earn nothing,” says Martens of Sony. “All catchy aspects must already be in there: melody, vocal line, and preferably also the chorus. Recognizability is the most important.”[1]
Playlist Power
“Skip rate, the percentage of skippers, is the most important measure for Spotify,” says Martens. “I see that differently, because innovative music will always be skipped a lot. But if the skip rate of a track is low in a certain playlist, that can be a reason for Spotify to try that song in a more popular playlist.”[1]
The Future of Music Production
Sony has also started a secret experiment where the data determines everything: Campsite Dream, an anonymous collective of producers that has already yielded tens of millions of streams on Spotify. “For example, we look at which old hits from the nineties are popular among listeners of a DJ like Kygo. And then we make a new version in that style.”[1]
“But even with all the data in the world, you have no guarantee of a hit,” says Martens. “Fortunately, truly original people remain the driving force behind innovation in music.”[1]
Source: Volkskrant , Haro Kraak ( translated)
thematic analysis
Data-Driven Decision Making
Streaming services provide unprecedented access to listener data, allowing the music industry to make more informed decisions about song production and promotion. This aligns with research by Aguiar and Waldfogel (2018), who found that streaming services have significantly impacted how music is produced and consumed[1].
Changes in Song Structure
The text highlights several changes in song structure, including shorter intros, earlier choruses, and overall shorter song lengths. These changes are driven by the need to capture listener attention quickly. Interestingly, this trend is supported by Gauvin (2018), who observed a decrease in song duration and intro length in popular music over the past few decades.
Genre Blending and Globalization
Streaming has facilitated faster mixing of genres from around the world, leading to increased popularity of urban and dance music. This globalization effect is consistent with findings by Verboord and Noord (2016), who noted that digital music platforms contribute to the internationalization of music consumption patterns.
Optimization for Playlists
Artists and producers are increasingly creating music with specific playlists in mind, aiming for inclusion in popular curated lists. This strategy is explored by Bonini and Gandini (2019), who discuss how playlist curation on Spotify has become a new form of gatekeeping in the music industry.
Production Techniques
The article mentions changes in production techniques, such as lower tempos and softer sounds, to optimize for streaming platforms. This trend is corroborated by Askin and Mauskapf (2017), who found that successful songs often balance novelty with familiarity in their sonic features.
Economic Implications
Streaming has changed the economic model of the music industry, with artists now focusing on generating streams rather than album sales. This shift is examined by Ingham (2019), who discusses how streaming has altered revenue streams and business models in the music industry.
These themes demonstrate the profound impact of streaming services on various aspects of music creation, distribution, and consumption, reflecting broader trends in the digitalization of cultural industries.
References:
[1] Aguiar, L., & Waldfogel, J. (2018). As streaming reaches flood stage, does it stimulate or depress music sales? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 57, 278-307.
Gauvin, H. L. (2018). Drawing listener attention in popular music: Testing five musical features arising from the theory of attention economy. Musicae Scientiae, 22(3), 291-304.
Verboord, M., & Noord, S. (2016). The online place of popular music: Exploring the impact of geography and social media on pop artists’ mainstream media attention. Popular Communication, 14(2), 59-72.
Bonini, T., & Gandini, A. (2019). “First Week Is Editorial, Second Week Is Algorithmic”: Platform Gatekeepers and the Platformization of Music Curation. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 2056305119880006.
Askin, N., & Mauskapf, M. (2017). What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 910-944.
Ingham, T. (2019). Streaming has changed everything. Music Business Worldwide. https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/streaming-has-changed-everything
Research Topics
10 research suggestions for 2nd year media students, based on the themes and trends discussed in the article about streaming services and their impact on the music industry:
The influence of streaming data on music production techniques and song structures
The role of playlists in shaping contemporary music consumption habits
The impact of streaming services on genre blending and globalization of music
Changes in artist marketing strategies in the streaming era
The evolution of A&R practices in record labels due to streaming analytics
The effect of streaming on song length and composition in popular music
The emergence and impact of playlist-specific music production
The relationship between streaming metrics and artist success in the digital age
The influence of streaming on local music scenes and cultural diversity
Ethical considerations in data-driven music creation and curation on streaming platforms
A research report is a structured document that presents the findings of a study or investigation. It typically consists of several key parts, each serving a specific purpose in communicating the research process and results.
The report begins with a title page, which includes the title of the research, author’s name, and institutional affiliation. Following this is an abstract, a concise summary of the entire paper, highlighting the purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. This provides readers with a quick overview of the study’s significance.
The introduction serves as the foundation of the report, presenting the research problem or question, providing relevant background information, and establishing the study’s purpose and significance. It often concludes with a clear thesis statement or research objective.
A literature review typically follows, surveying and evaluating existing research related to the topic. This section helps contextualize the current study within the existing body of knowledge and identifies gaps or areas for further investigation.
The methodology section is crucial, as it explains the research design, data collection methods, and analysis techniques used in the study. It should provide sufficient detail to allow others to replicate the study if desired.
The results section presents the findings of the study, often through text, tables, or figures. It should be objective and organized logically, highlighting key findings and supporting them with appropriate evidence.
The discussion section interprets and analyzes the results, relating them to the research objectives and previous literature. It explores the implications, limitations, and potential future directions of the study.
The conclusion summarizes the main points of the research paper, restates the thesis or research objective, and discusses the overall significance of the findings[4]. It should leave the reader with a clear understanding of the study’s contributions[4].
Finally, the report includes a references section, listing all sources cited in the research paper using a specific citation style. This is essential for acknowledging and giving credit to the works of others.
Some research reports may also include additional sections such as recommendations, which suggest actions based on the findings, and appendices, which provide supplementary information that supports the main text.
Digital Transformation and Radio: Investigate how radio has adapted to the digital age, focusing on online streaming and smart speaker integration[2].
Community Radio Impact: Explore the role of community radio in promoting local culture and empowering marginalized groups[4].
Radio’s Political Influence: Examine historical and contemporary cases where radio has played a significant role in political movements[5].
Future Prospects of Radio: Analyze the potential future of radio amidst competition from digital platforms like podcasts and streaming services[3].
Podcasts
Monetization Strategies: Study various monetization models for podcasts, including sponsorships, subscriptions, and crowdfunding[1].
Emerging Podcast Genres: Explore niche podcast genres that are gaining popularity and their specific audience demographics[5].
Platform Engagement: Analyze how different platforms (e.g., Spotify, Apple Podcasts) influence podcast audience engagement[1].
Community Building through Podcasts: Investigate how podcasts foster community among listeners and creators[4].
Television
Cultural Representation on TV: Assess how television portrays gender, race, and politics in contemporary dramas[2].
Streaming vs. Traditional TV Consumption: Compare viewing habits between traditional television and streaming platforms[2].
Reality TV’s Social Influence: Study the impact of reality television on public behavior and societal norms[2].
Television’s Role in Identity Formation: Explore how television content influences social identity and cultural perceptions[3].
Streaming Platforms
Algorithmic Content Recommendations: Investigate how algorithms on streaming services shape viewer choices and content discovery[1].
Shift from Traditional TV to Streaming: Analyze the transition of traditional TV networks to digital streaming services[2].
Ad-supported vs. Subscription Models: Compare user behavior and preferences between ad-supported and subscription-based streaming models[2].
Impact on Cinema Industry: Explore how the rise of streaming services affects traditional cinema industries[3].
Social Media
Influencer Marketing Impact: Study the influence of social media influencers on consumer purchasing decisions[1].
Political Campaigns on Social Media: Analyze the role of social media in modern political campaigns and activism efforts[1].
News Consumption via Social Media: Compare how different social media platforms are used for news consumption among various demographics[4].
Mental Health Effects on Youth: Investigate the implications of social media use on mental health, particularly among younger generations[1].
Printed Media
Challenges in the Digital Age: Examine the difficulties faced by printed newspapers as digital media becomes more prevalent[5].
Design’s Role in Magazines: Study how design elements influence reader engagement with printed magazines[4].
Journalism Quality Evolution: Explore historical changes in journalism standards due to evolving print technologies[5].
Audience Loyalty in Niche Journalism: Investigate factors that contribute to audience loyalty in niche magazines and journalism outlets[4].
News
Broadcast vs. Online News Consumption: Compare audience behaviors between broadcast news and online news platforms[1].
Countering Fake News: Analyze strategies employed to combat fake news across different media formats[5].
Traditional vs. Independent News Outlets: Study the roles of traditional news networks compared to independent news sources in current media landscapes[5].
Convergence of News Platforms: Explore how news platforms are converging and its impact on audience behavior and content delivery[1].
Digital Marketing
Influencer Culture Dynamics: Examine digital marketing’s role in shaping influencer culture across social media platforms[3].
Ethics in Data Collection: Investigate ethical considerations surrounding data collection for targeted digital marketing campaigns[3].
Organic vs. Paid Content Effectiveness: Compare the effectiveness of organic versus paid content in achieving brand reach goals[3].
Integrated Marketing Communications: Study strategies for integrating marketing communications across various digital platforms for cohesive branding efforts[3].
Drawing strong conclusions in social research is a crucial skill for first-year students to master. Matthews and Ross (2010) emphasize that a robust conclusion goes beyond merely summarizing findings, instead addressing the critical “So What?” question by elucidating the broader implications of the research within the social context.
Key Elements of a Strong Conclusion
A well-crafted conclusion typically includes several essential components:
Concise summary of the research process and methods
Restatement of research questions or hypotheses
Clear presentation of answers to research questions or hypothesis outcomes
Explanation of findings and their connection to research questions
Relation of findings to existing literature
Identification of new knowledge or understanding generated
Acknowledgment of research limitations
Reflection on the research process
Personal reflection on the research experience (when appropriate)
Avoiding Common Pitfalls
Matthews and Ross (2010) caution against two frequent errors in conclusion writing:
Inappropriate Generalization: Researchers should avoid extending findings beyond the scope of their sample, recognizing limitations of small sample sizes.
Introducing New Material: The conclusion should synthesize existing information rather than present new data or arguments.
The Importance of Context
Bryman (2016) adds that a strong conclusion should situate the research findings within the broader theoretical and practical context of the field. This contextualization helps readers understand the significance of the research and its potential impact on future studies or real-world applications.
Reflecting on the Research Process
Creswell and Creswell (2018) emphasize the importance of critical reflection in the conclusion. They suggest that researchers should evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of their methodology, considering how these factors may have influenced the results and what improvements could be made in future studies.
In conclusion, crafting a strong conclusion is a vital skill for first-year social science students. By addressing the “So What?” question, synthesizing findings, and reflecting on the research process, students can demonstrate a deep understanding of their work and its broader implications in the social world.
References:
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Matthews, B., & Ross, L. (2010). Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
Research proposals play a crucial role in the social sciences, serving as a roadmap for researchers and a tool for gaining approval or funding. Matthews and Ross (2010) emphasize the importance of research proposals in their textbook “Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences,” highlighting their role in outlining the scope, methodology, and significance of a research project.
The choice of research method in social research is a critical decision that depends on various factors, including the research question, available resources, and ethical considerations. Matthews and Ross (2010) discuss several key research methods, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Quantitative methods involve collecting and analyzing numerical data, often using statistical techniques. These methods are particularly useful for testing hypotheses and identifying patterns across large populations. On the other hand, qualitative methods focus on in-depth exploration of phenomena, often using techniques such as interviews, focus groups, or participant observation (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).
Mixed methods research, which combines both quantitative and qualitative approaches, has gained popularity in recent years. This approach allows researchers to leverage the strengths of both methodologies, providing a more comprehensive understanding of complex social phenomena (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010).
When choosing a research method, researchers must consider the nature of their research question and the type of data required to answer it effectively. For example, a study exploring the prevalence of a particular behavior might be best suited to a quantitative approach, while an investigation into the lived experiences of individuals might benefit from a qualitative methodology.
Ethical considerations also play a significant role in method selection. Researchers must ensure that their chosen method minimizes harm to participants and respects principles such as informed consent and confidentiality (Israel, 2014).
Structure
Introduction: This section sets the stage for your research by introducing the research problem or topic, clearly stating the research question(s), and outlining the objectives of your project3. It also establishes the context and significance of your research, highlighting its potential contributions and who might benefit from its findings
Literature Review: This section demonstrates your understanding of the existing knowledge and research related to your topic4. It involves critically evaluating relevant literature and synthesizing key themes and findings, providing a foundation for your research questions and methodology.
Methodology/Methods: This crucial section details how you plan to conduct your research4. It outlines the research design, the data collection methods you will employ, and the sampling strategy used to select participants or cases5. The methodology should align with your research questions and the type of data needed to address them.
Dissemination: This section describes how you intend to share your research findings with relevant audiences. It may involve outlining plans for presentations, publications, or other forms of dissemination, ensuring the research reaches those who can benefit from it.
Timetable: A clear timetable provides a realistic timeline for your research project, outlining key milestones and deadlines for each stage, including data collection, analysis, and writing6. It demonstrates your understanding of the time required to complete the research successfully.
References:
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Israel, M. (2014). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists: Beyond regulatory compliance. Sage.
Matthews, B., & Ross, L. (2010). Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.
Geef een reactie