Onderzoeksmethoden Research Methods

Tag: SPSS

  • Correlation (Chapter 8)

    Understanding Correlation in Media Research: A Look at Chapter 8

    Correlation analysis is a fundamental statistical tool in media research, allowing researchers to explore relationships between variables and draw meaningful insights. Chapter 8 of “Introduction to Statistics in Psychology” by Howitt and Cramer (2020) provides valuable information on correlation, which can be applied to media studies. This essay will explore key concepts from the chapter, adapting them to the context of media research and highlighting their relevance for first-year media students.

    The Power of Correlation Coefficients

    While scattergrams offer visual representations of relationships between variables, correlation coefficients provide a more precise quantification. As Howitt and Cramer (2020) explain, a correlation coefficient summarizes the key features of a scattergram in a single numerical index, indicating both the direction and strength of the relationship between two variables.

    The Pearson Correlation Coefficient

    The Pearson correlation coefficient, denoted as “r,” is the most commonly used measure of correlation in media research. It ranges from -1 to +1, with -1 indicating a perfect negative correlation, +1 a perfect positive correlation, and 0 signifying no correlation (Howitt & Cramer, 2020). Values between these extremes represent varying degrees of correlation strength.

    Interpreting Correlation Coefficients in Media Research

    For media students, the ability to interpret correlation coefficients is crucial. Consider the following example:

    A study examining the relationship between social media usage and academic performance among college students found a moderate negative correlation (r = -0.45, p < 0.01)[1]. This suggests that as social media usage increases, academic performance tends to decrease, though the relationship is not perfect.

    It’s important to note that correlation does not imply causation. As Howitt and Cramer (2020) emphasize, even strong correlations do not necessarily indicate a causal relationship between variables.

    The Coefficient of Determination

    Chapter 8 introduces the coefficient of determination (r²), which represents the proportion of shared variance between two variables. In media research, this concept is particularly useful for understanding the predictive power of one variable over another.

    For instance, in the previous example, r² would be 0.2025, indicating that approximately 20.25% of the variance in academic performance can be explained by social media usage[1].

    Statistical Significance in Correlation Analysis

    Howitt and Cramer (2020) briefly touch on significance testing, which is crucial for determining whether an observed correlation reflects a genuine relationship in the population or is likely due to chance. In media research, reporting p-values alongside correlation coefficients is standard practice.

    Spearman’s Rho: An Alternative to Pearson’s r

    For ordinal data, which is common in media research (e.g., rating scales for media content), Spearman’s rho is an appropriate alternative to Pearson’s r. Howitt and Cramer (2020) explain that this coefficient is used when data are ranked rather than measured on a continuous scale.

    Correlation in Media Research: Real-World Applications

    Recent studies have demonstrated the practical applications of correlation analysis in media research. For example, a study on social media usage and reading ability among English department students found a high positive correlation (r = 0.622) between these variables[2]. This suggests that increased social media usage is associated with improved reading ability, though causal relationships cannot be inferred.

    SPSS: A Valuable Tool for Correlation Analysis

    As Howitt and Cramer (2020) note, SPSS is a powerful statistical software package that simplifies complex analyses, including correlation. Familiarity with SPSS can be a significant asset for media students conducting research.

    References:

    Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2020). Introduction to Statistics in Psychology (7th ed.). Pearson.

    [1] Editage Insights. (2024, September 9). Demystifying Pearson’s r: A handy guide. https://www.editage.com/insights/demystifying-pearsons-r-a-handy-guide

    [2] IDEAS. (2022). The Correlation between Social Media Usage and Reading Ability of the English Department Students at University of Riau. IDEAS, 10(2), 2207. https://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/ideas/article/download/3228/2094/11989

    , , , , ,

  • Relationships Between more than one variable (Chapter 7)

    Exploring Relationships Between Multiple Variables: A Guide for Media Students

    In the dynamic world of media studies, understanding the relationships between multiple variables is crucial for analyzing audience behavior, content effectiveness, and media trends. This essay will explore various methods for visualizing and analyzing these relationships, adapting concepts from statistical analysis to the media context.

    The Importance of Multivariate Analysis in Media Studies

    Media phenomena are often complex, involving interactions between numerous variables such as audience demographics, content types, platform preferences, and engagement metrics. As Gunter (2000) emphasizes in his book “Media Research Methods,” examining relationships between variables allows media researchers to test hypotheses and develop a deeper understanding of media consumption patterns and effects.

    Types of Variables in Media Research

    In media studies, we often encounter two main types of variables:

    1. Categorical data (e.g., gender, media platform, content genre)
    2. Numerical data (e.g., viewing time, engagement rate, subscriber count)

    Based on these classifications, we can identify three types of relationships commonly explored in media research:

    • Type A: Both variables are numerical (e.g., viewing time vs. engagement rate)
    • Type B: Both variables are categorical (e.g., preferred platform vs. content genre)
    • Type C: One variable is categorical, and the other is numerical (e.g., age group vs. daily social media usage)

    Visualizing Type A Relationships: Scatterplots

    For Type A relationships, scatterplots are highly effective. As Webster and Phalen (2006) discuss in their book “The Mass Audience,” scatterplots can reveal patterns such as positive correlations (e.g., increased ad spend leading to higher viewer numbers), negative correlations (e.g., longer video length resulting in decreased completion rates), or lack of correlation.

    Recent advancements in data visualization have expanded the use of scatterplots in media research. For instance, interactive scatterplots can now incorporate additional dimensions, such as using color to represent a third variable (e.g., content genre) or size to represent a fourth (e.g., budget size).

    Visualizing Type B Relationships: Contingency Tables and Heatmaps

    For Type B relationships, contingency tables are valuable tools. These tables show the frequencies of cases falling into each possible combination of categories. In media research, this could be used to explore, for example, the relationship between preferred social media platform and age group.

    Building on this, Hasebrink and Popp (2006) introduced the concept of media repertoires, which can be effectively visualized using heatmaps. These color-coded tables can display the intensity of media use across different platforms and genres, providing a rich visualization of categorical relationships.

    Visualizing Type C Relationships: Bar Charts and Box Plots

    For Type C relationships, bar charts and box plots are particularly useful. Bar charts can effectively display, for example, average daily social media usage across different age groups. Box plots, as described by Tukey (1977), can provide a more detailed view of the distribution, showing median, quartiles, and potential outliers.

    Advanced Techniques for Multivariate Visualization in Media Studies

    As media datasets become more complex, advanced visualization techniques are increasingly valuable. Network graphs, for instance, can visualize relationships between multiple media entities, as demonstrated by Ksiazek (2011) in his analysis of online news consumption patterns.

    Another powerful technique is the use of treemaps, which can effectively visualize hierarchical data. For example, a treemap could display market share of streaming platforms, with each platform further divided into content genres.

    References

    Gunter, B. (2000). Media research methods: Measuring audiences, reactions and impact. Sage.

    Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31(3), 369-387.

    Ksiazek, T. B. (2011). A network analytic approach to understanding cross-platform audience behavior. Journal of Media Economics, 24(4), 237-251.

    Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.

    Webster, J. G., & Phalen, P. F. (2006). The mass audience: Rediscovering the dominant model. Routledge.

    , , ,

  • Standard Deviation (Chapter 6)

    The standard deviation is a fundamental statistical concept that quantifies the spread of data points around the mean. It provides crucial insights into data variability and is essential for various statistical analyses.

    Calculation and Interpretation

    The standard deviation is calculated as the square root of the variance, which represents the average squared deviation from the mean[1]. For a sample, the formula is:

    $$s = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} (x_i – \bar{x})^2}{n – 1}}$$

    Where s is the sample standard deviation, x_i are individual values, $$\bar{x}$$ is the sample mean, and n is the sample size[1].

    Interpreting the standard deviation involves understanding its relationship to the mean and the overall dataset. A low standard deviation indicates that data points cluster closely around the mean, while a high standard deviation suggests a wider spread of values[1].

    Real-World Applications

    In finance, a high standard deviation of stock returns implies higher volatility and thus, a riskier investment. In research studies, it can reflect the spread of data, influencing the study’s reliability and validity[1].

    The Empirical Rule

    For normally distributed data, the empirical rule, or the 68-95-99.7 rule, provides a quick interpretation:

    • Approximately 68% of data falls within one standard deviation of the mean
    • About 95% falls within two standard deviations
    • Nearly 99.7% falls within three standard deviations[2]

    This rule helps in identifying outliers and understanding the distribution of data points.

    Standard Deviation vs. Other Measures

    While simpler measures like the mean absolute deviation (MAD) exist, the standard deviation is often preferred. It weighs unevenly spread samples more heavily, providing a more precise measure of variability[3]. For instance:

    ValuesMeanMean Absolute DeviationStandard Deviation
    Sample A: 66, 30, 40, 64501517.8
    Sample B: 51, 21, 79, 49501523.7

    The standard deviation differentiates the variability between these samples more effectively than the MAD[3].

    Z-Scores and the Standard Normal Distribution

    Z-scores, derived from the standard deviation, indicate how many standard deviations a data point is from the mean. The formula is:

    $$z = \frac{x – \mu}{\sigma}$$

    Where x is the raw score, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation[2].

    The standard normal distribution, with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, is crucial for probability calculations and statistical inference[2].

    Importance in Statistical Analysis

    The standard deviation is vital for:

    1. Describing data spread
    2. Comparing group variability
    3. Conducting statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA)
    4. Performing power analysis for sample size determination[2]

    Understanding the standard deviation is essential for interpreting research findings, assessing data quality, and making informed decisions based on statistical analyses.

    Citations:
    [1] https://www.standarddeviationcalculator.io/blog/how-to-interpret-standard-deviation-results
    [2] https://statisticsbyjim.com/basics/standard-deviation/
    [3] https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/standard-deviation/
    [4] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/standarddeviation.asp
    [5] https://www.dummies.com/article/academics-the-arts/math/statistics/how-to-interpret-standard-deviation-in-a-statistical-data-set-169772/
    [6] https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/statistics-square-one/2-mean-and-standard-deviation
    [7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_variance
    [8] https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/investing/how-to-find-standard-deviation

  • Guide SPSS How to: Calculate the Standard Error

    Here’s a guide on how to calculate the standard error in SPSS:

    Method 1: Using Descriptive Statistics

    1. Open your dataset in SPSS.
    2. Click on “Analyze” in the top menu.
    3. Select “Descriptive Statistics” > “Descriptives”[1].
    4. Move the variable you want to analyze into the “Variables” box.
    5. Click on “Options”.
    6. Check the box next to “S.E. mean” (Standard Error of Mean)[1].
    7. Click “Continue” and then “OK”.
    8. The output will display the standard error along with other descriptive statistics.

    Method 2: Using Frequencies

    1. Go to “Analyze” > “Descriptive Statistics” > “Frequencies”[1][2].
    2. Move your variable of interest to the “Variable(s)” box.
    3. Click on “Statistics”.
    4. Check the box next to “Standard error of mean”[2].
    5. Click “Continue” and then “OK”.
    6. The output will show the standard error in the statistics table.

    Method 3: Using Compare Means

    1. Select “Analyze” > “Compare Means” > “Means”[1].
    2. Move your variable to the “Dependent List”.
    3. Click on “Options”.
    4. Select “Standard error of mean” from the statistics list.
    5. Click “Continue” and then “OK”.
    6. The output will display the standard error for your variable.

    Tips:

    • Ensure your data is properly coded and cleaned before analysis.
    • For accurate results, your sample size should be sufficiently large (typically n > 20)[4].
    • The standard error decreases as sample size increases, indicating more precise estimates[4].

    Remember, the standard error is an estimate of how much the sample mean is likely to differ from the true population mean[6]. It’s a useful measure for assessing the accuracy of your sample statistics.

    Citations:
    [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1TlZ5hqmaQ
    [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VakRmc3c1O4
    [3] https://ezspss.com/how-to-calculate-mean-and-standard-deviation-in-spss/
    [4] https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/standard-error/
    [5] https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264056275-8-en.pdf?accname=guest&checksum=CB35D6CEEE892FF11AC9DE3C68F0E07F&expires=1730946573&id=id
    [6] https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cognos-analytics/11.1.0?topic=terms-standard-error
    [7] https://s4be.cochrane.org/blog/2018/09/26/a-beginners-guide-to-standard-deviation-and-standard-error/
    [8] https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/can-i-compute-robust-standard-errors-spss

  • Standard Error (Chapter 12)

    Understanding Standard Error for Media Students

    Standard error is a crucial statistical concept that media students should grasp, especially when interpreting research findings or conducting their own studies. This essay will explain standard error and its relevance to media research, drawing from various sources and adapting the information for media students.

    What is Standard Error?

    Standard error (SE) is a measure of the variability of sample means in relation to the population mean (Howitt & Cramer, 2020). In media research, where studies often rely on samples to draw conclusions about larger populations, understanding standard error is essential.

    For instance, when analyzing audience engagement with different types of media content, researchers typically collect data from a sample of viewers rather than the entire population. The standard error helps quantify how much the sample results might differ from the true population values.

    Calculating Standard Error

    The standard error of the mean (SEM) is calculated by dividing the sample standard deviation by the square root of the sample size (Thompson, 2024):

    $$ SEM = \frac{SD}{\sqrt{n}} $$

    Where:

    • SEM is the standard error of the mean
    • SD is the sample standard deviation
    • n is the sample size

    This formula highlights an important relationship: as sample size increases, the standard error decreases, indicating more precise estimates of the population parameter (Simply Psychology, n.d.).

    Importance in Media Research

    Interpreting Survey Results

    Media researchers often conduct surveys to gauge audience opinions or behaviors. The standard error helps interpret these results by providing a measure of uncertainty around the sample mean. For example, if a survey finds that the average daily social media usage among teenagers is 3 hours with a standard error of 0.2 hours, researchers can be more confident that the true population mean falls close to 3 hours.

    Comparing Media Effects

    When comparing the effects of different media types or content on audiences, standard error plays a crucial role in determining whether observed differences are statistically significant. This concept is fundamental to understanding t-tests and other statistical analyses commonly used in media studies (Howitt & Cramer, 2020).

    Reporting Research Findings

    In media research papers, standard error is often used to construct confidence intervals around sample statistics. This provides readers with a range of plausible values for the population parameter, rather than a single point estimate (Scribbr, n.d.).

    Standard Error vs. Standard Deviation

    Media students should be aware of the distinction between standard error and standard deviation:

    • Standard deviation describes variability within a single sample.
    • Standard error estimates variability across multiple samples of a population (Scribbr, n.d.).

    This distinction is crucial when interpreting and reporting research findings in media studies.

    Reducing Standard Error

    To increase the precision of their estimates, media researchers can:

    1. Increase sample size: Larger samples generally lead to smaller standard errors.
    2. Improve sampling methods: Using stratified random sampling or other advanced techniques can help reduce sampling bias.
    3. Use more reliable measurement tools: Reducing measurement error can lead to more precise estimates and smaller standard errors.

    Conclusion

    Understanding standard error is essential for media students engaged in research or interpreting study findings. It provides a measure of the precision of sample statistics and helps researchers make more informed inferences about population parameters. By grasping this concept, media students can better evaluate the reliability of research findings and conduct more rigorous studies in their field.

    Citations:
    [1] https://assess.com/what-is-standard-error-mean/
    [2] https://online.ucpress.edu/collabra/article/9/1/87615/197169/A-Brief-Note-on-the-Standard-Error-of-the-Pearson
    [3] https://www.simplypsychology.org/standard-error.html
    [4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MewX9CCS5ME
    [5] https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/standard-error/
    [6] https://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7567/urlt/y1996-7.pdf
    [7] https://www.biochemia-medica.com/en/journal/18/1/10.11613/BM.2008.002/fullArticle
    [8] https://www.psychology-lexicon.com/cms/glossary/52-glossary-s/775-standard-error.html

  • Guide SPSS How to: Calculate ANOVA

    Here’s a step-by-step guide for 1st year students on how to calculate ANOVA in SPSS:

    Step 1: Prepare Your Data

    1. Open SPSS and enter your data into the Data View.
    2. Create two columns: one for your independent variable (factor) and one for your dependent variable (score)
    3. For the independent variable, use numbers to represent different groups (e.g., 1, 2, 3 for three different groups)

    Step 2: Run the ANOVA

    1. Click on “Analyze” in the top menu.
    2. Select “Compare Means” > “One-Way ANOVA”
    3. In the dialog box that appears:
    • Move your dependent variable (score) to the “Dependent List” box.
    • Move your independent variable (factor) to the “Factor” box

    Step 3: Additional Options

    1. Click on “Options” in the One-Way ANOVA dialog box.
    2. Select the following:
    • Descriptive statistics
    • Homogeneity of variance test
    • Means plot
    1. Click “Continue” to return to the main dialog box.

    Step 4: Post Hoc Tests

    1. Click on “Post Hoc” in the One-Way ANOVA dialog box
    2. Select “Tukey” for the post hoc test
    3. Ensure the significance level is set to 0.05 (unless your study requires a different level)
    4. Click “Continue” to return to the main dialog box.

    Step 5: Run the Analysis

    Click “OK” in the main One-Way ANOVA dialog box to run the analysis

    Step 6: Interpret the Results

    1. Check the “Test of Homogeneity of Variances” table. The significance value should be > 0.05 to meet this assumption
    2. Look at the ANOVA table:
    • If the significance value (p-value) is < 0.05, there are significant differences between groups
    1. If significant, examine the “Post Hoc Tests” table to see which specific groups differ
    2. Review the “Descriptives” table for means and standard deviations of each group

    Remember, ANOVA requires certain assumptions to be met, including normal distribution of the dependent variable and homogeneity of variances

    Always check these assumptions before interpreting your results.

  • Guide SPSS How to: Calculate the dependent t-test

    Here’s a guide for 1st year students on how to calculate the dependent t-test in SPSS:

    Step-by-Step Guide for Dependent t-test in SPSS

    1. Prepare Your Data

    • Ensure your data is in the correct format: two columns, one for each condition (e.g., before and after)
    • Each row should represent a single participant

    2. Open SPSS and Enter Data

    • Open SPSS and switch to the “Variable View”
    • Define your variables (e.g., “Before” and “After”)
    • Switch to “Data View” and enter your data

    3. Run the Test

    • Click on “Analyze” in the top menu
    • Select “Compare Means” > “Paired-Samples t Test”.
    • In the dialog box, move your two variables (e.g., Before and After) to the “Paired Variables” box
    • Click “OK” to run the test

    4. Interpret the Results

    • Look at the “Paired Samples Statistics” table for descriptive statistics
    • Check the “Paired Samples Test” table:
    • Find the t-value, degrees of freedom (df), and significance (p-value)
    • If p < 0.05, there’s a significant difference between the two conditions

    5. Report the Results

    • State whether there was a significant difference.
    • Report the t-value, degrees of freedom, and p-value.
    • Include means for both conditions.

    Tips:

    • Always check your data for accuracy before running the test.
    • Ensure your sample size is adequate for reliable results.
    • Consider the assumptions of the dependent t-test, such as normal distribution of differences between pairs.

    Remember, practice with sample datasets will help you become more comfortable with this process.

  • Guide SPSS How to: Calculate the independent t-test

    Step-by-Step Guide

    1. Open your SPSS data file.
    2. Click on “Analyze” in the top menu, then select “Compare Means” > “Independent-Samples T Test”
    3. In the dialog box that appears:
    • Move your dependent variable (continuous) into the “Test Variable(s)” box.
    • Move your independent variable (categorical with two groups) into the “Grouping Variable” box
    1. Click on the “Define Groups” button next to the Grouping Variable box
    2. In the new window, enter the values that represent your two groups (e.g., 0 for “No” and 1 for “Yes”)[1].
    3. Click “Continue” and then “OK” to run the test

    Interpreting the Results

    1. Check Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances:
    • If p > 0.05, use the “Equal variances assumed” row.
    • If p ≤ 0.05, use the “Equal variances not assumed” row
    1. Look at the “Sig. (2-tailed)” column:
    • If p ≤ 0.05, there is a significant difference between the groups.
    • If p > 0.05, there is no significant difference
    1. If significant, compare the means in the “Group Statistics” table to see which group has the higher score

    Tips

    • Ensure your data meets the assumptions for an independent t-test, including normal distribution and independence of observations
    • Consider calculating effect size, as SPSS doesn’t provide this automatically

  • Guide SPSS How to: Calculate Chi Square

    1. Open your data file in SPSS.
    2. Click on “Analyze” in the top menu, then select “Descriptive Statistics” > “Crosstabs”
    3. In the Crosstabs dialog box:
    • Move one categorical variable into the “Row(s)” box.
    • Move the other categorical variable into the “Column(s)” box.
    1. Click on the “Statistics” button and check the box for “Chi-square”
    2. Click on the “Cells” button and ensure “Observed” is checked under “Counts”
    3. Click “Continue” and then “OK” to run the analysis.

    Interpreting the Results

    1. Look for the “Chi-Square Tests” table in the output
    2. Find the “Pearson Chi-Square” row and check the significance value (p-value) in the “Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)” column
    3. If the p-value is less than your chosen significance level (typically 0.05), you can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is a significant association between the variables

    Main Weakness of Chi-square Test

    The main weakness of the Chi-square test is its sensitivity to sample size[3]. Specifically:

    1. Assumption violation: The test assumes that the expected frequency in each cell should be 5 or more in at least 80% of the cells, and no cell should have an expected frequency of less than 1
    2. Sample size issues:
    • With small sample sizes, the test may not be valid as it’s more likely to violate the above assumption.
    • With very large sample sizes, even small, practically insignificant differences can appear statistically significant.

    To address this weakness, always check the “Expected Count” in your output to ensure the assumption is met. If not, consider combining categories or using alternative tests for small samples, such as Fisher’s Exact Test for 2×2 tables

  • Guide SPSS How to: Correlation

    Calculating Correlation in SPSS

    Step 1: Prepare Your Data

    • Enter your data into SPSS, with each variable in a separate column.
    • Ensure your variables are measured on an interval or ratio scale for Pearson’s r, or ordinal scale for Spearman’s rho

    Step 2: Access the Correlation Analysis Tool

    1. Click on “Analyze” in the top menu.
    2. Select “Correlate” from the dropdown menu.
    3. Choose “Bivariate” from the submenu

    Step 3: Select Variables

    • In the new window, move your variables of interest into the “Variables” box.
    • You can select multiple variables to create a correlation matrix

    Step 4: Choose Correlation Coefficient

    • For Pearson’s r: Ensure “Pearson” is checked (it’s usually the default).
    • For Spearman’s rho: Check the “Spearman” box

    Step 5: Additional Options

    • Under “Test of Significance,” select “Two-tailed” unless you have a specific directional hypothesis.
    • Check “Flag significant correlations” to highlight significant results

    Step 6: Run the Analysis

    • Click “OK” to generate the correlation output

    Interpreting the Results

    Correlation Coefficient

    • The value ranges from -1 to +1.
    • Positive values indicate a positive relationship, negative values indicate an inverse relationship[1].
    • Strength of correlation:
    • 0.00 to 0.29: Weak
    • 0.30 to 0.49: Moderate
    • 0.50 to 1.00: Strong

    Statistical Significance

    • Look for p-values less than 0.05 (or your chosen significance level) to determine if the correlation is statistically significant.

    Sample Size

    • The output will also show the sample size (n) for each correlation.

    Remember, correlation does not imply causation. Always interpret your results in the context of your research question and theoretical framework.

    To interpret the results of a Pearson correlation in SPSS, focus on these key elements:

    1. Correlation Coefficient (r): This value ranges from -1 to +1 and indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between variables
    • Positive values indicate a positive relationship, negative values indicate an inverse relationship.
    • Strength interpretation:
      • 0.00 to 0.29: Weak correlation
      • 0.30 to 0.49: Moderate correlation
      • 0.50 to 1.00: Strong correlation
    1. Statistical Significance: Look at the “Sig. (2-tailed)” value
    • If this value is less than your chosen significance level (typically 0.05), the correlation is statistically significant.
    • Significant correlations are often flagged with asterisks in the output.
    1. Sample Size (n): This indicates the number of cases used in the analysis

    Example Interpretation

    Let’s say you have a correlation coefficient of 0.228 with a significance value of 0.060:

    1. The correlation coefficient (0.228) indicates a weak positive relationship between the variables.
    2. The significance value (0.060) is greater than 0.05, meaning the correlation is not statistically significant
    3. This suggests that while a small positive correlation was observed in the sample, there’s not enough evidence to conclude that this relationship exists in the population
    4. Remember, correlation does not imply causation. Always interpret results in the context of your research question and theoretical framework.